this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
22 points (95.8% liked)

Ask Science

9694 readers
37 users here now

Ask a science question, get a science answer.


Community Rules


Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.


Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.


Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.


Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.


Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.


Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.


Rule 7: Report violations.Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.


Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.


Rule 9: Source required for answers.Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.


By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.

We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi scientists of lemmy, I'm a computer scientist with basic college level physics and an interest in physics. I was reading Cosmos by Carl Sagan yesterday and he mentions that if you use a Geiger counter next to an uranium ingot you will detect the uranium's spontaneous decay as a stream of helium nucleei. Does helium nucleei mean 2 protons and some number of neutrons? What happened to the respective electrons? Does this mean that each uranium atom, with 92 protons, entirely splits into 46 helium nucleei or does it release some number of helium nucleei leaving another element behind? How does the concept of half life play into this? Does it mean that in a uranium half life, half of my ingot would've become helium? Finally, how is this stream of helium nucleei so dangerous to living beings? Thanks for your attention

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kiwifruit@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

I'm not a scientist, but do teach science.

Uranium decay is a fascinating process with a lot going on. When Sagan talks about a stream of helium nuclei, he is referring to alpha particles. These are helium four nuclei, which means they contain two protons and two neutrons. They are emitted from the nucleus of a uranium atom during radioactive decay.

The missing electrons are an interesting part of this. When an atom of uranium ejects an alpha particle, it loses two protons, but its electrons remain for a moment, making the new atom highly ionized. Over time, the uranium ion will stabilize as it interacts with other atoms. The ejected alpha particle, which is just a bare helium nucleus, will also eventually capture two free electrons from the environment and become a neutral helium atom.

Uranium does not completely break apart into helium nuclei. Instead, it undergoes a slow process where each atom decays step by step. When uranium 238 undergoes alpha decay, it does not vanish but transforms into thorium 234. Thorium is also radioactive and will continue decaying through a long chain of transformations, eventually becoming lead, which is stable. So uranium is not simply breaking into helium, it is gradually changing into different elements.

Half-life plays an important role in this process. The half-life of uranium 238 is about 4.5 billion years, meaning that if you started with a pure chunk of uranium, after that time only half of it would still be uranium. The other half would have decayed into different elements. But it is not just turning into helium. While each decay event emits a helium nucleus, the uranium itself is transforming into new elements along the way. Over long periods, the uranium will be replaced with a mixture of lead and other decay products, while the helium gas may escape into the environment.

The danger of alpha radiation comes from how it interacts with living tissue. Alpha particles are highly ionizing, which means they can cause severe damage at a cellular level. However, they do not penetrate very far. A sheet of paper or even human skin can block them. The real risk comes from inhaling or ingesting radioactive materials. If uranium dust or other alpha-emitting particles enter the body, they can directly damage DNA, increasing the risk of cancer and other health problems. That is why uranium and similar materials are dangerous if they are inhaled or ingested but not as much of a threat when they are simply sitting in solid form.

Uranium decay is a gradual process where atoms lose helium nuclei one by one, transforming into different elements over time. Half-life describes how long this process takes, with only a fraction of the uranium decaying in a given time period. Alpha radiation is dangerous inside the body but does not travel far outside of it.

  1. Uranium-238 - Wikipedia:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium-238

  2. Uranium Decay Series - ScienceDirect Topics:https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/uranium-decay-series

  3. The Timeline of Radioactive Decay for Uranium-238 - IET:https://www.theiet.org/media/8813/radioactive-decay-rate-of-uranium-238.pdf

  4. Decay Chain - Wikipedia:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decay_chain

Someone asks a question and an expert in the field appears to give a detailed answer. Total reddit moment ducks

[–] PostProcess@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This is a great response! Now do the 'why' it decays, that will surely be the follow up question!

[–] rafagnious@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

I only didn't ask this because Sagan actually explains that part in the book.

If I understood correctly, protons repel each other, and the reason atoms don't usually tear apart is because neutrons exert a force over protons that can counter that repelling and keep the atom's nucleous together. If an isotope does not have enough neutrons to fully counter the proton's repelling forces, it is deemed "unstable" and eventually loses nuclear particles. This is the case of Uranium-238.

Why uranium-238 loses specifically 2 protons and 2 neutrons was not explained, but I assume it's a result of the specific difference between the forces of neutrons holding it together and the forces of protons repelling each other.

Feel free to correct me if I got anything wrong.

[–] rafagnious@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

Great response! Thank you

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not the OP, but this is a great answer, I bet your students are grateful for you.

[–] rafagnious@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

As the OP, I definitely agree

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago

holy cow great explanation, thanks