this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
-29 points (26.2% liked)

Canada

9336 readers
1846 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This may be an unpopular opinion but we should consider moving the Canada / US border 250km north along the Detroit river. Moving the border north 250km would reduce the amount of cross border trips for the automotive industry negating a lot of the tariff issues. And I don't think the geniuses ruling the US would realize that moving the border north along this stretch would result in Canada gaining over 9000km² of land.

The reason this may be unpopular is because Canada would inherit the Detroit Red Wings.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CowsLookLikeMaps@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Now is not the time to be discussing moving the border, a topic which was started by trump in the context of threats to our sovereignty. I don't find this funny and see it in poor taste.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago

I hear you on the sensitivity of border discussions, but think of Charlie Chaplin’s "The Great Dictator"—a film that used humour and satire to expose the absurdity of dictators. Its impact was significant, as it helped shift public opinion away from totalitarian ideals during a critical time. Let's keep making fun of the clown king and his henchmen.

[–] Haess@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Greg@lemmy.ca -3 points 2 days ago

What specifically do you oppose about the suggestion?

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, this topic is totally joke worthy. Yuk Yuk!

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Humour can disarm tyranny; when policies are mocked, their illogical foundations become obvious.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Except when they've publicly flosted the idea of revisiting border treaties the satire becomes outright support.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Misinterpreting the exaggerated proposal as a genuine endorsement of border changes is a fundamental misunderstanding of satire. The intent is to ridicule the absurdity of the idea, not to promote it. It’s ridiculous to suggest that a hyperbolic comment meant to expose flawed logic could be seen as support for actual policy revisions.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

/shrug

I don't think the plurality of people agree with your interpretation based on votes (I did not downvote). Perhaps worth examining whether your intent is being understood.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I assume a lot of those down votes are from folks who never clicked the post and didn't realize that Detroit is north of the Detroit river. Maybe I need to work on my delivery, my wife does give me a lot of eye rolls. I still think we need to mock Trump and friends to stop their BS from becoming normalized

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

I agree to give them no quarter

Trump is definitely stupid enough to do it without understanding anything. The only question is whether someone with an actual brain can get to him before he tweets about it. Because the second he says it publicly, his narcissistic ego will only allow him to double down regardless of what it does to the US or him personally. Ideally someone would float the idea to him on air

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Looked up this area on a map… are you talking about absorbing Detroit into Canada? As in, expanding our borders into America and taking over Eastern Michigan?

Or are you talking about pulling our border back up the Ontario panhandle, towards London and Mississauga?

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I’m suggesting moving the border due north along the Detroit river. This would result in over 9000 square kilometres of land being ceded to Canada (including most of Detroit and many of the automotive factories). The beauty of this proposal is that it would have support from loads of MAGA folks because they’re likely geographically illiterate.

Edit: to be crystal clear, I’m not suggesting ceding any Canadian territory.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

What confuses me is that the Detroit river, and the border with it, runs almost completely north to south. So saying you want to move that border westward to absorb Detroit would make a hell of a lot more sense.