this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
696 points (98.5% liked)

News

28227 readers
6950 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Davin@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

Weird, guy who breaks laws with impunity doesn't care about laws.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

When Donald Trump’s former chief strategist Steve Bannon said “I’m a firm believer that President Trump will run and win again in 2028,” last week, it should have been a surprise, but wasn’t. “We’re working on it. … We’ll see what the definition of term limit is,”the dishevelled Bannon told NewsNation. It wasn’t the first time he had mentioned it either. The president’s adviser, who went to prison for refusing to testify before a congressional committee about the 6 January insurrection, suggested it in December. Then, he argued that Trump could circumvent the 22nd amendment, which codifies the two-term limit, because the word “consecutive” is not in the text of the document.

Trump has been making his feelings clear too. Shortly after his election victory last November, the president told congressional Republicans: “I suspect I won’t be running again unless you say, ‘He’s so good we’ve got to figure something else out’.” 

Then, in January, during the annual House Republican retreat in Florida, he joked with speaker Mike Johnson: “Am I allowed to run again, Mike?” In February, he asked supporters at the White House: “Should I run again? You tell me.” Offhand musings about a third term in office sound less like bluster and more like a blueprint.

If we’re sharing articles can we make the effort to add a couple relevant paragraphs under the headline? Otherwise the discussion ends up being about the headline and often innaccurate.

[–] derfunkatron@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice

You’d think that the absence of the word “consecutive” and the phrase “no… more than twice” would mean quite clearly that it’s two terms period, not one, plus two consecutive terms.

Unless, of course, these fuckheads are arguing that consecutive terms count as one.

Fuck.

[–] Fillicia@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If consecutives terms would count as one then Obama could run again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tyrant@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ill try to do that but... People should also read the article before before impulse commenting.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

As someone who’se shared hundreds of articles on reddit then lemmy.

Good luck getting more than 1% to read the article. People want headlines, scrollable information bits that they can instinctively react on.

That’s why paragraphs under are useful. Makes people atleast read those before commenting a gut reaction to an oversimplified headline.

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If I understand correctly, the magoffs like Bannon want to craft it to exclude Obama (and Bill Clinton and W) but include donvict.

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-third-term-proposal-has-clause-stop-barack-obama-running-2020334

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

There is a dictatorship happening to the south. Professors are leaving Yale University for the University of Toronto. For God’s sake, get out and vote in Canada in our upcoming election. Danielle Smith is blatantly snuggling up with MAGA. And PP keeps changing his ideologies with the political wind. Save our sovereignty.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 120 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Yes, but if Trump refuses to leave office then he will need some serious guards. My understanding of the Constitution is that he becomes a domestic threat at that point and "fighting him" is technically legal ... and required by anyone that took an oath to defend the Constitution.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 101 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Technically he's barred from office per the 14th amendment.

Technically is great until it's ignored.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

The people who wrote the 14th amendmend fucked up. They did not specify how the disqualification clause is supposed to be invoked.

I mean, how are we suppose to invoke that?

States? If so, red states could just ban democrats by abusing the disqualification clause.

Conviction in courts? Well, trump never got convicted for treason/sedition. States convictionss of fraud isn't disqualifying.

Simple Majority in congress? Well, again, a unified congress can just use it to disqualify the other party.

Supermajority? Well, that would never happen.

Supreme court? Well... look at the composition of the court

So... yea... somebody fucked up.

Blame the authors of the 14th amendment.

[–] sith@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is impossible to write an eternal constitution. Believing that is the biggest flaw of the American mindset.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 25 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I'm pretty sure the Founders were under the impression that we'd rewrite the Constitution periodically when we discovered loopholes or other new problems they didn't foresee.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

You mean like how every other country handles their constitution? That's crazy talk.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dryfter@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago

He's already a domestic threat, he doesn't care about the Constitution or laws

[–] sith@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 days ago

The constitution means whatever the guy with the biggest guns says it means.

[–] loopedcandle@lemmynsfw.com 33 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I first took that oath 20 years ago. If orange idiot refuses to leave, I will be exercising my constitutional legal actions.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Why? Because no matter how much the unhinged right, many "centrists", and some of the leftists and a lot of the corporate media mocked those among the Democrats that said democracy is at risk....it is.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

At risk? It's dead no matter what party. It's time to start rebuilding.

[–] Haess@lemmynsfw.com 142 points 3 days ago (3 children)

God, I wish that kid didn't miss.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 49 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So do I, but this problem is much bigger than one man. He could not do what he's doing without support from many rich donors and his party (which in turn relies on the support of the 30% of the country that reliably votes for them). Trump and many of his voters may be idiots but most of those other people are not, at least not in the intellectual sense of the word. They are making a calculated choice to enable fascism because they think it's better for them personally than democracy. That belief and it's associated threat to our country isn't going away when Trump dies. In fact, it might get much worse if they can find someone who can advance that agenda without being a bumbling fool most of the time.

[–] AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee 40 points 3 days ago

Thankfully the French created a device that is perfect for solving such issues, we just require the societal will to do so.

Hitler survived 30+ attempts, just sayin'... 🤷‍♂️

People who run this simulation really be giving the villains plot armor 😭

[–] CallateCoyote@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm told we really shouldn't wish death on anybody... so I really wish he had gotten a bullet in his brain and been a vegetable hooked up to life support machines for many, many years.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

I don't support the death penalty because those individuals are no threat to society, many of them are innocent, and the government shouldn't have that kind of power when it's unnecessary.

None of that applies. Also, I don't wish him dead. I just want him gone. The method of his removal is just a secondary concern.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MantisToboggon@lazysoci.al 176 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don't think they're going to let a little thing like the laws get in the way of a good time.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 68 points 3 days ago (4 children)

How about a national militia of tesla burners?

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 72 points 3 days ago

I remember the Russian military recruitment offices burning these past years, and their railroads getting sabotaged.

The western press proudly stated "this is what happens when you don't allow people to protest, they turn to sabotage".

But I guess this administration missed the memo.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DistressedDad@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago

If Trump was elected in the 80s, he wouldn't be alive long enough to change the name plate of the oval office desk. We're living through such a wild time in history.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 79 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Just remember, if his new administration has proven anything, it is that the difference between legal and illegal in the American political system is mostly down to everyone being willing to go along with that law. There is very little actual teeth behind a lot of it at the high up federal level.

So it might be unconstitutional for him to run again, but who is actually going stop him? He has more guns and more sycophants than the court system.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StopTouchingYourPhone@lemmy.world 65 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yesterday, former President Donald Trump told a group of supporters that they won’t have to vote again if they elect him to the presidency. “You won’t have to do it anymore,” Trump said at the Turning Point Believers’ Summit in Florida. “It’ll be fixed; it’ll be fine; you won’t have to vote anymore, my beautiful Christians.” - The Atlantic, July '24

'When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.' - Maya Angelou

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atempuser23@lemmy.world 68 points 3 days ago (9 children)

I assume Schumer will agree to this because we wouldn’t want deny the American people a choice. I wish the democrats lived in reality.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Conservative don't like bypassing term limit. Conservative subreddit are already not happy. So yep it's matter of time some maga nut bag will revolt against him.

[–] pleasegoaway@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Conservatives WILL like it when their media tells them how to justify/spin it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cool_Name@lemm.ee 37 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I hope the republicans have better aim this time.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] carrion0409@lemm.ee 18 points 2 days ago

Last I checked werent the mods going full gestapo and banning anyone who questioned trump ? That sub really is a shithole.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

One already tried to shoot him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZMonster@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The comments seem to be missing the fact that elections are state run, so if he is allowed to run a third time, it won't be him that broke the law it will be the states and their reps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tyrant@lemmy.world 65 points 3 days ago (12 children)

Twenty-Second Amendment

Section 1

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

Section 2

This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 72 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Supreme court:

Amendment schmamendment.

[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago

To make this explicit, the law is what Trump and his merry band of miscreants say it is, unless we're willing to step up as a country and say 'No it isn't' and back those words up with action, if needed. All the words in the Constitution are is ink on a piece of paper, unless we're willing to stand and fight for them.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 51 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I remember when Republicans used to say things like "if you threaten my consitumitutional rights I will fight you to the end"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 44 points 3 days ago (9 children)

Canuck here. When is the Civil War kicking off? I'm sure they'll be a fair number of Canadians who will come and help remove him from office. We'll for sure send some of our highly trained Canadian Geese to assist lol

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] VeryInterestingTable@lemm.ee 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You mean The Third Reich ?

[–] Ramenator@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Remember: The Nazis never officially abolished the democratic Weimar constitution. They just hollowed it out until it was completely ineffectual

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PurpleSkull@lemm.ee 31 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Trump already looks 20 years older 2 months into his second presidency. Look at pictures of him yesterday. How on earth would he even run for a third term, physically I mean? He will be the oldest president EVER by the time his term ends. 2 Years older than Biden when he left. A third term would serve no one but the actual rulers Peter Thiel and Musk behind him....oh.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›