linuxmemes

It's very efficient for what it does. and your programs will actually open.

People bitching about Flatpaks don't understand that they have dedupe built in. You're literally not using any more space and it's easier for app developers to deploy.

Try using Snaps sometime, if you want something to actually bitch about.

No problem, just makr sure your system has the exact version of libraries the application needs. And oh, you will only update those dependencies when the application update updates the requirements.

Oh what's that? Another application you want to install uses the same lib but different version? Tough luck, chump!

Seriously it's either flatpaks or the multi-version dependency management that openSUSE has, and you're not saving much more space here either.

Another missed occasion to have taken a screenshot. There's gnome-screenshot, scrot, your DE's integrated tool and so many others to choose from, you can do it!

That sort of shit makes me hate the modern internet. (Also screenshots are cleaner and therefore compress better since you seem to care (rightfully) about storage space.)

So maybe use Debian and compile the app yourself instead? The Dev made something free with their time, use your time to make it work for you.

Flatpaks implement deduping, so they actually don't take that much space when installed.

I habe a PC with an 8gb SSD

I think I found your real problem.

"maybe a software being excessively bloated isn't a good thing"

"just buy more storage bro"

B*tch. i live in a third world country, with limited internet and data plan, and also is still a student. If i can just buy more storage and better hardware i will.

Alternatively though, if an app has KDE library dependencies for example, it's kinda nice to not have to install a whole other desktop system wide.

There's very good reasons that app developers focus on flatpaks, which mostly revolves around how incredibly terrible the experience is creating native packages for each distro and each release version of those various distros.

Flatpak used to be problematic, but even a loud hater of Flatpak, Richard Brown of openSUSE, now lauds Flatpak as an excellent solution after his criticisms were addressed.

8GB SSD

There’s your problem. The last time 8GB was plenty was in 1998.

Why the hell do you only have 8GB? Are you trying to install flatpaks on a smart fridge?

Don't your filesystem deduplicate it on the fly anyway?

Yeah flatpak won't work on my Nokia 3310 either, what a shit software...

Edit: if you upvoted this comment, your kneecaps pop when you pick up things from the ground

Flatpak seems to be the best choice for consistency and to have it working straight out of the box. I think Linux currently needs this because we're getting a lot less tech-savvy Linux users nowadays. Don't get me wrong; package managers should still be used, but how are we going to get people to change if they run into package conflicts or accidentally uninstall a wrong package?

You hate people who spend hundreds of ours of their free time developing software, who then release that software for free, under no obligation to you or anyone else, and your reasoning is because they provide it in a packaging solution you don't find ideal?

Maybe fuck off and write your own software.

Cut the crap. Flatpak uses hardlink from repo where file names are jash of the file itself. The chance of duplication is exactly same as that of duplicate files of same name in same directory.

Flatpak repo grows because we trade uncertainty over abi stability with installing all needed versions of libraries. For abi incompatible builds you could already do that in many distros (versioned soname) but to a lesser extent.

Also I usually do not install nvidia GL with flatpaks that I won't run on nvidia on hybrid gpu laptops anyway for energy reasons.