this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

680 readers
662 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

found this article; i think you guys will like it.

Why Authoritarianism Keeps Failing in America

  1. A New Kind of Threat Yes, authoritarianism is rising. No, you’re not being dramatic. We’re seeing elected officials attack civil liberties, punish dissent, undermine elections, and flood the media with disinformation. We’re watching right-wing movements echo the playbooks of history’s worst regimes.

But something’s not quite clicking for them.

This country—chaotic, divided, overexposed, and too-online for its own good—isn’t behaving like authoritarian regimes usually expect. And that’s because this isn’t the 1930s. It’s not post-coup Chile. It’s not Russia in the 2000s. It’s the United States in the age of TikTok, burner phones, and 400 million privately owned guns.

So no, this isn’t a classic descent into dictatorship. This is something messier. Something more desperate. And something—believe it or not—easier to fight.

  1. Why This Isn’t a Classic Coup Traditional authoritarian regimes consolidate power through a clear sequence:
  • Seize the press
  • Disarm the population
  • Militarize rapidly
  • Purge opponents
  • Control the narrative
  • Enforce obedience

But in the U.S., those conditions don’t fully exist. They can’t.

The media landscape is fractured beyond repair. Millions of Americans are heavily armed. The military isn’t loyal to one leader—and they’re not interested in rounding up civilians. Purges would go viral before they even started. And the people being targeted? They’re not whispering in fear—they’re livestreaming the resistance.

It’s not that fascism isn’t trying to rise. It’s that it doesn’t have the runway it needs.

2.5. Historical Authoritarianism Had One Advantage: Control

Look at the regimes that got it right—if “right” means total dominance.

Nazi Germany didn’t allow an armed civilian population. They had a tightly centralized propaganda machine—Joseph Goebbels controlled nearly every word that reached the public. Dissent was not just dangerous, it was invisible. There were no viral videos from inside the camps. No group chats organizing resistance.

The Soviet Union didn’t let you choose your news source. They didn’t let you own a weapon. And if you stepped out of line, you didn’t just get “canceled”—you got sent to the gulag, or you disappeared.

Pinochet’s Chile, backed by the U.S., taught people to fear their own neighbors. Surveillance, torture, black-bag arrests. It was swift, brutal, and mostly silent.

That’s what successful authoritarianism has always relied on: control over the story, control over the people, and control over the consequences.

That’s what they’re still trying to build here.

But they can’t—not fully. Not with a population this loud, this skeptical, this armed, and this unwilling to let one voice narrate reality.

  1. The Internet Changed the Game In the past, authoritarian propaganda was a one-way street. The regime spoke, the media echoed, the people obeyed—or else. Control the press, control the people.

But that’s not how it works anymore.

Now, counter-narratives explode in seconds. One video can unravel a lie. One tweet can mobilize a movement. People don’t just consume media—they create it. We have Substacks, podcasts, TikToks, Discord servers, underground newsletters, and livestreams from inside the chaos. You can’t control all of it. Hell, you can barely track it.

And that’s a problem for any wannabe authoritarian. When everyone has a mic, there’s no silence to rule over.

Propaganda still exists, but so do infinite ways to call it out. That’s not a guarantee of truth—but it’s a guarantee that no one gets to claim the only version of it.

  1. We’re the Most Armed Civilian Population in the World This part makes people uncomfortable—but it’s reality. There are over 400 million privately owned firearms in this country. That’s more guns than people. And while gun culture is messy, politicized, and often deeply flawed, it changes the authoritarian calculus.

No modern dictatorship has ever taken root in a nation this armed.

That doesn’t mean a civil war is inevitable. It means an easy takeover is impossible.

It means state violence can be met with resistance. It means forced obedience has consequences. It means fear only works up to a point.

They don’t want people to talk about this. But it’s a factor—and they know it.

  1. The Real Threat Is Division—Not Control The modern authoritarian threat in America isn’t a sudden military coup—it’s slower, sneakier. It’s about distraction and division. It’s about convincing people their neighbors are the enemy. It’s psychological warfare: memes over mandates, culture war over civil war.

They don’t need tanks on every corner. They just need you to stop trusting anyone. They want you to feel isolated, hopeless, and too exhausted to fight back.

But here’s the thing—they only win if we play along. They can’t divide people who are willing to stand together.

  1. Why We Still Have Power We have speech. We have weapons. We have the internet. That alone makes us different from almost every country that’s fallen to fascism.

The systems are flawed. The institutions are imperfect. But they’re not fallen. Not yet.

And people are awake. They’re organizing. They’re pushing back in ways big and small—from union drives to protest marches to TikToks that reach millions.

This isn’t the same old story. And we’re not the same kind of people.

6.5. What We Can—and Must—Do If you’re angry, good. If you’re scared, better. Now use it.

Speak out—online, in public, in your workplace. Support independent journalism and content creators who aren’t bought and paid for. Vote in every election, no matter how small. Join protests. Build community networks. Refuse to be divided by race, gender, class, or belief.

Fascism feeds on silence and isolation. That means our resistance begins wherever people gather and speak freely.

This isn’t just about watching history repeat itself. It’s about refusing to let it.

  1. They Can’t Win If We Don’t Let Them Authoritarianism is rising. But so is awareness. So is resistance. So is refusal.

They’ve rigged the game, stacked the deck, and tried to sell fear as fate. But they still haven’t won. And that should tell you everything you need to know.

Because you can’t conquer a population that’s too connected, too informed, and too stubborn to be ruled.

Not without a fight. And not without breaking first. And we haven’t broken yet.


Originally Posted By u/Tokinruski At 2025-04-02 03:33:38 PM | Source


top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

It's a hopium piece, and as such perhaps not politic to criticise, but all of the points on the list are and have been happening.

Fox news and alt-right sources effectively have pushed out all other press for a unified part of the population. Many of the large news outlets and social media (FB, IG, Xitter, Truth Social, etc) are also heavily aligned if not outright colluding. The buyout of TikTok has been stated to be to push alt-right narratives. Also, disinformation and division create questionable narratives outside of the indoctrination silos.

Being armed is not very useful in the US, with the militarization and terror the police force is known for, as well as national guard, an armed militia is still hopelessly unmatched. Even more so if there's no consideration for human life as shown in police and prison extrajudicial killings, school shootings and other incarcerations.

Besides, part of the current purge is to disappear, deport and/or murder those who are organising the resistance, including protesters, counter propaganda, organisers, conscientious objectors, as well as judicial or legislative opponents.

Through terror, illegal action and replacement they're also enforcing obedience.

The only thing they seem to be struggling with is to control the narrative, possibly because they had such an easy time of it last time. Too many factions have been bought in, some with conflicting coin, or maybe they're trying the Russian model of saturating the infoscape with conflicting narratives to confuse and numb the population.

I'd say this very much follows the recipe for autocratic coups, borrowing ideas from Russia, Hungary and Turkey beyond the classics of USSR, nazi Germany, Italy, Korea, Japan, etc.