this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1321 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

68348 readers
4120 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

While I hate Google, this seems like one of those much ados over nothing. They specifically mention 'sex, gender, or sexual orientation', which to most reasonable people would cover gender identity.

[–] patatahooligan@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Gender" means nothing without context. By a MAGAs definition of gender this policy doesn't protect trans people, for example. We don't know how this rule will be interpreted in practice. Even if you don't consider the intent behind making this change, this is objectively a weaker guarantee of protection than what we had with "gender identity and expression".

This is not a legal contract, it's a general guideline for users about what is or isn't acceptable. The intent and spirit of the terms are clear, the only question is whether Google will enforce them not. If the enforcement is crappy, like what Facebook is famous for, it doesn't matter a damn what exact terminology they use in the guidelines.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You still think things are run by reasonable people?!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gamer@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What matters is how this affects enforcement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fxdave@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm not in favor of YouTube, but what exactly missing here?

[–] Chocobofangirl@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It used to say gender expression and identity. If it doesn't, that's a deliberate decision that could cause enforcement calls like 'well that's not your REAL gender so this isn't harassment'.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 79 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When an influential group of powerful people make hate speech a part of their standard rhetoric, is EXACTLY when you MUST block it on your platform, not a signal that it's time to start letting it slide, you fucking pricks.

[–] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Pichai kissed the ring. He's colluding with the person who tried to overturn the elections and install himself as a ruler.

All of the billionaires that were at the inauguration are in the same boat. I'm at a point where I believe the crimes of any of them should be tried and convicted with the punishments being doled out collectively to all colluders, but that's me.

I'd be going for the death penalty from the prosecution side, since it seems like that is what we do now to people who cause one or more people to die, no matter how unethical the victim(s) were.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spicehoarder@lemm.ee 44 points 1 day ago (12 children)

I hated Google far before it was cool. I would feel vindicated if it weren't so damn overdue. They don't even contribute meaningfully to society. And I mean that about EVERYTHING

Gmail is lame, their search engine sucks, chrome wastes resources, their ads platform ruined the internet, Golang fundamentally sucks, the emulation layer of android is so fucking wasteful, Material Design ruined digital creativity, etc.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] PerfectDark@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago (9 children)

And people judged me for watching YouTube with uBlock Origin, or via NewPipe for eons.

Look who's laughing now.

[–] Trihilis@ani.social 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good lord, the amount of idiots that white knighted me for using uBlock.

"WOULD U WORK FOR FREEEEE????!!?"

Like fuck off no I wouldn't. I also dont buy up every other company I see, turn it to shit and then try to force a political agenda through it, and guess who IS doing that using billions of dollars? Yep, Google.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Everyone should check out PeerTube sometime, the UX has improved a lot and there's a decent amount of content too. I recommend installing the PeerTube Companion app. It shows a popup on YouTube if you've clicked on a video that is also available on PeerTube.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How is discoverability in PeerTube? That was the sticking point for me with PeerTube as with Mastodon last time I looked. It was not easy to discover what's out there.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago

~~Don’t~~ be evil

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

youtube has enshittified for a while, they went downhill as soon as they announced that they no longer backed election denial reports. then all the right wing, anti-woke videos started popping up all over the place, plus the one that try to seem like its both sides videos too.

allowing people like beast, and others to dominate the front, was asking for trouble.

[–] nature_man@lemmy.blahaj.zone 93 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Reposting my comment another post relating to this situation

I mean this is just them making official how they've been acting for 2 years minimum, as much as google and youtube want to act progressive and inclusive, people still get demonetized for talking about lgbtq or women's issues, unless they are harassing them, in which case the video will stay up no matter how many of youtube's rules it breaks. For example, trans NB game critic Stephanie Sterling had multiple harassment videos against them (they listed pronouns as they/them last I checked, please correct if changed) that are still up right now, several years after upload, despite those videos exclusively attacking them for being trans/non-binary, which breaks youtube's TOS

Companies are not your friend.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 136 points 2 days ago (9 children)

So, sundar pinchai can be added to the list of CEOs that suck?

Because a lot of the time, it's weird that when the company does nasty shit, nobody names him as the head asshole in charge the way that other companies and ceos get handled.

The dude has been in the driver's seat for pretty much every major deterioration of Google/alphabet for years.

[–] luce@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 20 hours ago

it’s weird that when the company does nasty shit, nobody names him as the head asshole in charge the way that other companies and ceos get handled.

hard to remember name (for americans, europeans, or at least me) i assume compare that to "Spez" which is very, very easy to remember and plaster around as the one evil to blame for a systems behavior

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 156 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (119 children)

Stop using youtube.

EDIT: A lot of people real fuckin triggered by this and looking for any excuse to keep using. Fucking addicts.

load more comments (119 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 62 points 1 day ago (5 children)

"Don't Be Evil"

(I know this hasn't been the Google motto in years -- when it stopped was one of the biggest corporate red flags)

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›