this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
771 points (95.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

7495 readers
3221 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Now say he's a featherless (female) biped and we're full circle

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 days ago (4 children)

In this economy?

There's gotta be at least six figures worth of eggs in this photo

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hedge_lord@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Look man I know that my taxonomy doesn't work... but have you considered that it was created with the intent to work?

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm having trouble finding anyone born with intention. Neither biology nor evolution have plans or intentions. We are fundamentally lipid based sacks of water.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They're arguing from a religious perspective that understands God as providing intentionality

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Which is a self-defeating argument, because if it were true, then women who don't have eggs are functioning exactly as "intended," and don't fit this definition of "woman"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chirospasm@lemmy.ml 138 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Diogenes would be proud here

[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 86 points 3 days ago (8 children)

My first thought too.

To anyone unaware, plato defined man as "a featherless biped" so Diogenes brought a plucked chicken

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 107 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I find the phrase “Born with the intention” in itself worthy of head-scratching.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 39 points 3 days ago (13 children)

I think its meant sort of as physical intention aka the body doesn't have the ability to "hold eggs" (jfc) yet but will try to develop the capability in the future. A sneaky way to try and include infertile cis women but it still excludes many of them as there are various reasons for infertility. Interestingly the phrasing also excludes all women post menopause but that's to be expected given the amount of representation those usually get (the amount being zero).

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Women are born with their eggs, but that’s not true for women who are born without ovaries, which has got to be possible, so this is a dumb definition anyway

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cyphear@lemm.ee 28 points 2 days ago

Ah, I can see Diogenes has made an impact on people.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 73 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

One internet search later:

https://patient.info/forums/discuss/born-without-ovaries-634173

There are cis women born without ovaries.

Thus Lea the bigot is disproven.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago

There's hormonal, chromosomal, and gamete definitions of biological woman/man and you'll want to be specific about which youre referencing and why it is even relevent for the text.

Hormonal woman with XY ("male") chromosomes and no eggs: Complete Androgen Insensitivity

Chromosomal woman with no eggs and low hormones: Swyer Syndrome (born without ovaries)

Men who have eggs: Chimeras, probably, and this guy: https://www.yahoo.com/news/chinese-man-shocked-learn-ovaries-202311718.html

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is this the kind of picture millionaires take these days?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 3 days ago (6 children)

It is deeply confusing to me why people think they can define a word in a way that covers all it's meaning and no additional ones and make fun of those who admit they can't.

Challenge for anyone, define "to eat". Remember, you have to cover eating soup but not drinking tea, or smoothie. But obviously, that isn't everything.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That man is moments away from financial disaster

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

That man is 100% in Germany. He's fine.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›