this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
376 points (73.6% liked)

Selfhosted

46639 readers
1560 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (5 children)

Devil's advocate:

These cost far less to maintain than having a team or two dedicated to upkeep for the trees.

That said, these things are a terrible idea, clearly the brainchild of techbros, and overall a massive eyesore. Trees are objectively the better option. Just not Bradford Pear trees... Anything but the cum tree.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 16 hours ago

I don't agree that these are an eyesore, they are not as pretty as a tree, no, but disgustingly ugly? Nah.

Seems like a decent idea if you have an over developed location where you can't plant a tree.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

The "cost" of maintaining trees is paid by the city to people living, buying things and paying taxes in the city.
People who don't have a college education and get to make a living working outside, improving their neighborhood.

The fake trees are likely put up and maintained by a tech corporation from out of state.

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Someones gunna break it too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 6 points 16 hours ago

So I appreciate some outside the box thinking. But this just reeks of techbros invent trees but worse. Most of the considerations below seem to think trees and cars are natural enemies, I would argue we reduce cars instead.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

at least give it some shape that is not an eye sore to start with

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Trees don't make number go up.

[–] filister@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

Don't you want to subscribe to our Tree Ultimate program, that will give you a limited access to a living tree for 199.99 a month or 1999 a year?

[–] a1studmuffin@aussie.zone 2 points 13 hours ago

Liquid Trees! Slam it down fast!

[–] kooks_only@lemmy.ca 4 points 15 hours ago

pm2 restart liquidtrees

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The only liquid trees I approve of are the kinds that come in a 510 threaded cart and you smoke.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 13 hours ago

You can bioengineer algae to do pretty much anything.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

'What's wrong with trees? They're taking up space for real estate development, stupid peasant."

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 2 points 15 hours ago
[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago
[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Enjoy the mosquitos

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So, they left a bucket of water to stagnate next to a bus stop?

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 3 points 14 hours ago

My neighbor's pool is looking like a liquid tree, nobody's writing articles about him.

[–] don@lemm.ee 2 points 16 hours ago

I’m only conjecturing, but there may be cities where planting trees isn’t feasible due to density of the city and the surrounding infrastructure. It may be cheaper to use these in place of trees, though I admit I know nothing about what’s pictured.

[–] RelativeArea0@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

this

https://youtube.com/watch?v=DZ_T4zMBx6E

ik its youtube, calm down your pitchforks

[–] Lightsong@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

I like the innovation this, it could lead to another and better idea.

Also what are the chance that once they're deployed, somebody run into one on the first day? Pretty good I bet.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›