this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
127 points (96.4% liked)

World News

46549 readers
1873 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There are several ways to describe someone held against their will, each with its own implications. The word “prisoner” suggests someone detained on suspicion of crimes or captured during times of war. “Hostage,” on the other hand, signifies a civilian held against their will.

Since the start of Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, corporate media outlets in the U.S. typically describe Israeli captives as “hostages,” even if they are soldiers, and Palestinian captives as “prisoners,” even if they are children.

American news outlets on Monday referred to Alexander as “the last living American hostage” in Hamas custody. Anchors and analysts alike made little to no mention of his service with the IDF, instead grouping him with civilians who were also taken by Hamas.

For Omar Baddar, a Palestinian American political analyst who was previously with the Institute for Middle East Understanding, the news coverage of Alexander is a perfect example of “anti-Palestinian bias” within media. Many outlets failed to mention crucial context, Baddar said, such as “his active membership in a foreign military at the time of his capture, and more precisely the Israeli occupation army that was enforcing the illegal blockade on Gaza” even before October 7.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 16 points 3 hours ago

You cannot read Western coverage of Palestine without learning about Ermon and Chomsky's "five filters of media". It's like a decoder ring.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

This is of course by design. The media wants the average Joe to think "Palestinian bad, Isreali good".

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Hamas’s negotiating tactics make the term hostage applicable, even for soldiers.

The real question is whether Palestinians held by Israel should be called hostages. I would argue yes but they aren’t as open about the threats to them and their use as pawns in negotiations.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You would argue that children kidnapped by Israel should be called prisoners and active duty soldiers guarding a concentration camp should be called hostages?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

No? Maybe you should read again.

Hostages are defined by their usage as pawns by their captors. Whether they are soldiers, children, or guinea pigs has little relevance to that.

Also, I would add that imprisoning people is almost always wrong, so the distinction between hostage and prisoner isn’t as morally significant as mainstream society believes.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It has a lot of relevance to it because it is what defines whether they are hostages or PoW's.

A hostage is when someone is taken captive without valid reason. Which is what Israel does.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 58 minutes ago* (last edited 57 minutes ago) (1 children)

That’s absolutely not what the word hostage means. A hostage is a prisoner used as a bargaining chip. The validity of the action has no bearing on it.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hostage

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago)

Hamas captures these people because they are soldiers. Working in the division which is responsible for the starvation of Gaza. That is an entirely different reason.

In virtually every conflict soldiers are captured and traded for soldiers of the other party or other diplomatic goals. Using this term for soldiers would make it so every PoW becomes a hostage and the term loses all meaning.

Next thing you know people are getting "kidnapped from tanks"

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world -2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

All hostages are prisoners, but not all prisoners are hostages. The distinction is with a hostage, the implication is that they will be used to trade for something where with a prisoner that's not there

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

Ukraine and Russia are both trading PoW's so you would say they are taking hostages instead of prisoners?

[–] kaeurennetwo@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago

What is world?