this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
43 points (97.8% liked)

Anti-Corporate Movement

873 readers
1 users here now

This community is the first one on lemmy of its kind. It sits between the idea of anarchism/anti-capitalism and left leaning economic policy.

Our goal is to make people aware of the dangers of corporate control, its influence on governments and people as well as the small but steady abrasion of empathy around the world indirectly caused by it.

Current topics this includes but is not limited to:

Feel free to debate this but beware, corporate rhetoric is not welcome here. If you have arguments, bring them on. If its rhetoric trying to defend the evil actions of corporations, we will know and you will go.

Our declared goal so far is to have all companies and individuals worldwide capped at 999 mil USD in all assets, including ownership of other companies, sister companies and marital assets. The reason for this is that companies (and individuals) are not supposed to resemble small(?) countries with a single leader(-board) and shareholder primacy. Thats why we feel like they must be kept in check indefinitely.

But companies will just wander off The argument that large companies will just wander off is valid, which we embrace. We dont need microsoft, apple, google, amazon and other trillion dollar companies. There are small competitors being kept small and driven into brankruptcy by anti competitive behavior of these giants or simply bought up and closed. If starbucks left tomorrow, we would not have an issue with this.

But then we have x little microsofts that all belong to the same person(s) If in fact nobody was allowed to accumulate more than 999 mil in assets, they would not be able to own all these. And like defending agains burglary, it is not about complete defence but time and effort. You only have to keep the thief occupied long enough for them to be caught, give up or make a mistake.

But these giants have tons of IP which would then limit our growth Thats another topic we must touch on. We will (only this one time) take a page out of russias playbook and demand that IP of non complying companies (assets over 999 mil USD) will be declared invalid, which opens them up to be copied.

But then they will "live" in one country that doesnt accept this Correct, and they should be taken into custody the moment they enter the airspace of a country that supports this act.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/post/897851

Security researchers say Meta and Yandex used native Android apps to listen on localhost ports, allowing them to link web browsing data to user identities and bypass typical privacy protections.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Why so little?

The fine for this kind of intentional non-compliance with the spirit of the law they've already fallen foul of in the past should be an existential threat to them. Something like 200% of revenue from relevant geo for the next 5 years.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why more? The ruling class does not fight their own. Its just enough so it looks good to the ordinary person.

[–] not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

EU's been doing kinda OK lately.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

You mean in terms of fining these megacorps? Nah, its the bare minimum and its just food for the "centrists" to use against those who denounce the cruelty of capitalism alltogether.

[–] elgordino@fedia.io 7 points 2 weeks ago

"We are in discussions with Google to address a potential miscommunication regarding the application of their policies,"

Ah yes just a common miscommunication. Nothing to see here.