How's it risky? The media's still trying to sanewash it.
It's also not questioning Trump's flunkies' damage assessment.
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
226 points (98.7% liked)
politics
24289 readers
2855 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah a big gamble, who knows what might happen if people think he's a liar!
God damn I hate this country. Every mainstream news outlet is just working in their own way to manufacture concent for more war. It's so fucking gross and so obvious to anyone paying attention. Fuck this place.
Narrator: he lied
Love that AP News considers an utterly illegal, inhumane, and unnecessary bombing to be a 'risky moment'. Instead of, you know, a crime against humanity.
The pledges mean nothing; Trump uses words as nothing more than a way to get people to do what he wants. To him, speaking truthfully is as foreign and unnecessary as speaking backwards.
You think his cult members won't eat this up and just follow their Daddy because he told them so, Associated Press? That's rich, they're already out there justifying it. Once they get their marching orders from FOX, it will be "war is a good thing and when we said wars in the middle east were bad we just meant only when they're started by Democrats" conveniently ignoring how few of them have been started by Democrats instead of being spearheaded by Republicans like the faked intelligence leading to the Iraq War. Democrats didn't push it, they just went along with it because public sentiment said the people wanted war. Democrats, being the wishy washy fucks they are, bent over and said "I'll do whatever I need to keep idiots happy and voting me back in."
Not so much voting them back in as much as donating to the DNC, democrats ultimately don't care about winning, in fact they make more money when they're losing.
there’s the targeted message of the month!
The talking points I’m picking up are:
-
this isn’t a real war, we were in and out with precision munitions, and our people are back safe, everyone should praise them for being so awesome;
-
Iran has been a bully for decades, and somebody needs to punch the bully in the mouth, when that happens everyone stands back and is happy the bully got punched in the mouth;
-
this isn’t a new war, Iran has been at war with us and our allies for a long time via their proxy groups
-
Biden was never able to take care of business, now Trump is in and it’s taken care of, and only the Americans could’ve done it because of our awesome military technology.
somebody needs to punch the bully in the mouth
That second point is so much more applicable to Russia, but they sing a wholly different tune with regard to that.
The only “risk” is if the people fail to rise up and overthrow Trump. We failed that, we will lose group of all freedom.
Oh this war? It’s not stupid Netanyahu told him so. So it has to be true
risky moment
FFS.
Stupid moment, more like.
A move ignoring the input of his own Intelligence Dept (if Gabbard/intelligence can be used??) and specifically executed in hopes Chump can parlay it into that Peace Prize he's been jonesing for with the added benefit of making Netan-yayhoo happy.
Effect: oil prices will rise substantially, US is now open to another 9/11 event with the regime of ultimate stupidity in charge, Putain will not react happily, and other such fun and joy I haven't yet thought of...
Fucking. Idiot. Impulsive. OutOfControl. Toddler.