this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
345 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

72729 readers
1523 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hera@feddit.uk 53 points 2 weeks ago

Love seeing open source projects from companies that aren't specifically tech firms

[–] Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 48 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I saw the headline and was ready to rage about why they should just use signal instead. Then I read the article and honestly this is a fucking genius use of tech

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

I read it and don't understand. Why is this better than Signal? Or the 500 other secure file/messaging protocols?

Jabber seemed to work perfectly for Snowden...

[–] rosco385@lemmy.wtf 48 points 2 weeks ago (49 children)

Because analysing network traffic wouldn't allow an adversary to see what you're sending with Signal, but they could still tell you're sendig a secure message.

What the Guardian is doing is hiding that secure chat traffic inside the Guardian app, so packet sniffing would only show you're accessing news.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

I downloaded the guardian app and couldn't find the option.

load more comments (48 replies)
[–] Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For one, ease of access. Say you’re trying to break a story, who are you going to message with signal? Because you’re going to need to get that contact info somehow right?

Snowden is permanently stranded in Russia. That’s not exactly a great example of an anonymous source.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

Messaging protocols already resemble the frameworks that come out from time to time. And their effectiveness is due to the fact that they require a certain quota of users.

It's just a secure messaging app with a direct line to Guardian journalists. How to use 911 or special numbers when you're not feeling well.

Yeah this is insanely good

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

Similar to other apps, CoverDrop only provides limited protection on smartphones that are fully compromised by malware, e.g., Pegasus, which can record the screen content and user actions.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

The tech behind the tool conceals the fact that messaging is taking place at all. It makes the communication indistinguishable from data sent to and from the app by our millions of regular users.

Reminds me of how the Germans in WW1 knew they couldn't trust their diplomatic codes anymore so they just sent the important messages in the normal, innocuous telegraph system and diplomatic pouches. They knew that foreign intelligence would be focused on the bogus secure messages.

Horrible name sadly

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If you want to blow the whistle on somebody and wonder if the Guardian is trustworthy I suggest you ask Julian Assange.

load more comments
view more: next ›