Do your forged conversations maintain linguistic integrity? i.e., do they make sense, hold together over the fake conversation, and match the personas of the participants? Digitally testing as valid is one level. If a human reads it, will it still pass?
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
1 points (66.7% liked)
Cryptocurrency
1385 readers
1 users here now
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
that’s on the person forging, it’s not doing any crazy forging on its own. it could, but like you said, i think that’d run into an issue of not being believable by not matching the personas and conversation context. that said, my belief is you probably don’t need perfect forgeries, just the ability to create plausible ones.
there’s still lots of open questions around usability and the practical deniability of it, just want to make sure the crypto side makes sense.