Politics

10682 readers

146 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Socialism

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

circularfish@beehaw.org

knokelmaat@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

Delta’s AI spying to “jack up” prices must be banned, lawmakers say (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 day ago by PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au to c/politics@beehaw.org

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One week after Delta announced it is expanding a test using artificial intelligence to charge different prices based on customers' personal data—which critics fear could end cheap flights forever—Democratic lawmakers have moved to ban what they consider predatory surveillance pricing.

In a press release, Reps. Greg Casar (D-Texas) and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) announced the Stop AI Price Gouging and Wage Fixing Act. The law directly bans companies from using "surveillance-based" price or wage setting to increase their profit margins.

If passed, the law would allow anyone to sue companies found unfairly using AI, lawmakers explained in what's called a "one-sheet." That could mean charging customers higher prices—based on "how desperate a customer is for a product and the maximum amount a customer is willing to pay"—or paying employees lower wages—based on "their financial status, personal associations, and demographics."

Read full article

Comments

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] theangriestbird@beehaw.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If passed, the law would

and that's where i stopped. why would the AI president sign anything that hampers the "growth" of AI? it sucks, i hate it, and that means republicans support it.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Democracy sucks when nothing I support has the faintest chance of passing.

[–] theangriestbird@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

just the way the billionaires like it!

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 3 points 1 day ago

They can kindly fuck off.