this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
436 points (97.6% liked)

Games

41304 readers
1089 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Funny, it turns out it is more brand damaging not to sell adult games, than to sell them....

[–] eletes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

Yeah before all this if you told me "MasterCard is selling incest and rape games!" I would have said no, Steam is doing that. But now I feel like they want to have a heavier hand.

Ultimately I think it's pressure from the Trump admin/project 2025 on companies to eventually make porn illegal

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 146 points 6 days ago (8 children)

"Unlawful" based on what? American law?

These are global payment companies, they can't just have a "we don't allow payment for illegal content" cause that varies by country (and by state even).

What an absolutely nothing statement.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 43 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We should demand mastercard shut down all payments to everyone, as their very business model clearly falls afoul of the laws of the People's Republic of North Korea.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Now this is the kind of movement I can get behind.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 6 days ago

Exactly in the US I can buy an assault rifle. Something that would be a crime in most other countries.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They're obviously basing it on the local laws of the business and customer. That varies from each transaction to the next. They're just saying that they don't restrict anything that they aren't legally required to restrict.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago

I don't think that's accurate because they asked Dlsite before them to restrict their content based on American Law. They tried to remove access to content from outside Japan that Visa was complaining about and Visa still told them to remove the content (I guess cause people were using VPNs) so they had to remove the ability to pay with visa and Mastercard entirely.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 6 days ago

From the article

So this seems like Mastercard are basically saying "it's not us".

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 days ago

Publicly, they're saying we don't want to get sued for allowing the purchase of illegal content, We have no problem with legal content.

That's not to say that's how they are phrasing it too the publishers.

[–] l_isqof@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

By that reasoning they should not accept payments for alcohol, as that's illegal in some countries...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] backgroundcow@lemmy.world 82 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

MasterCard's and Valve's statements seems to point at Stripe and PayPal as the ones who folded to the pressure. These payment processors then cited MasterCard's rules to back up their change in policy.

MasterCard now clarifying that the payment processors are over-interpreting the rules and anything legal is ok seems a very good thing here. Valve should be able to go back to Stripe and PayPal with this and say: "Hey, you've misunderstood the rules you are quoting; MasterCard themselves say anything legal is ok, and that is the exact policy we've been using!"

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 29 points 6 days ago

I love how they form a consortium that stays in lockstep to maintain their oppressive control over everyone else.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 77 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

So Valve says the processors - such as Stripe and PayPal - pressed the issue based on pressure from MasterCard (and possibly Visa). MasterCard says they had nothing to do with it. Itch says that Stripe was directly responsible in their case with a blanket ban on anything generally sexy, but that Stripe blamed their banking partners.

So Stripe, at least, is directly responsible but insists they are under outside pressure. This means the pressure is coming from one or more actual banks. Since we don’t have names, we have to do some research to find out who Stripe works with. The possibilities I was able to dig up on a quick search include:

  • Citigroup
  • Wells Fargo
  • Barclays
  • Goldman Sachs
  • Evolve Bank & Trust

It seems clear that this has nothing to do with legality in any jurisdiction and that some powerful financial institution is forcing their twisted, puritanical morality on anyone they can at the behest of like-minded authoritarian terrorists. One or more of the above institutions are most likely at fault.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Shittygroup

Hellsfargo

Nutglaze

Oldball sacks

Devolve bank mistrust

This is all still project 2025

Donald Trump is on the Epstein list and is a child rapist

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tonytins@pawb.social 21 points 6 days ago

I have a hunch this goes one step higher than the private banks.

Sure. Let them whatabout. But to us, consumers, it shouldn't matter.

We know the stores aren't responsible, so we shouldn't attack them.

The processors are. For Visa and MasterCard it's pretty obvious. Itch, as you said, puts direct blame on Stripe, and I think we can trust that.

As much as processors need banks, banks also need processors. It's a sort of symbiosis. Damage to one actually trickles onto the other. So pressing onto processors isn't a mistake. It'd be foolish at best and malicious at worst to suggest that.

Now that we have leverage as users and consumers, having started a push which made way and caused a response (first the prepared phone statement and now a press release), the absolute wrong thing to do is bacl down and say "sorry, we were wrong, it was B after all and not you, A".

And look at it this way: There's less payment processors and they're smaller than banks. If you suddenly turn to banks, you won't accomplish anything because to them, a few consumers who aren't their customers doesn't cause them even an itch. But if payment processors come to them it might.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 36 points 6 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

There's been two decades worth of lawsuits because PayPal has a history of withholding revenue and blocking small e-commerce stores.

I'm talking about e-commerce sites selling a board game, making $40k in sales through paypal, and PayPal refuses to give them money.

PayPal's stance has been, "Fuck you sue us."

I'm not saying this because I think Peter Thiel, who was one of the creators of Paypal, is a fucking evil villain.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It was an Elon company. Does it surprise anyone that it’s corrupt as fuck?

Silicon Valley used to call the founding staff of PayPal the PayPal Mafia

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 56 points 6 days ago (1 children)

By that standard, I ought not be able to use the card to buy booze (might give it to a minor or use for a Molotov Cocktail) a gun (obviously could use for crime) , and probably a million other things they let people buy with cards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 44 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If this is true then I honestly hope Steam and Itch go "ok, then, PayPal and Stripe are banned from the store as payment forms until we can figure out a way of limiting content you can pay with them". Honestly I don't think enough people use either of those payments forms, and even if they do currently they almost assuredly have a card they can use instead, and are more likely to switch payment methods than to stop buying games.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 41 points 6 days ago (2 children)

IIRC Stripe is the main payment processor. If you’re paying with a visa or mastercard online, it’s usually via stripe. Hence, the immediate censorship.

Paypal can go fuck itself and die

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago

Stripe can also go fuck itself and die, thanks

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Ah, if that's the case then MC statement is kind of pointless, so it's not them putting the pressure, but you still have to go through the people putting the pressure to get to them. I thought that if you put your card number on steam it had some more direct form of charging than going through stripe.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately they are indeed big players, Stripe where people use credit cards and PayPal everywhere else. Both horrible companies that we'd be a lot better off if replaced with privacy-respecting alternatives.

[–] razzazzika@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I mainly use PayPal as a necessary evil so I don't have to pull out my wallet and put the card info in every time I want to buy a game. I dunno maybe I SHOULD go back to that because then only the games that are worth the effort of getting up off the couch are the ones I'd buy.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You can just save your card info in steam. No need for paypal for that.

Honeslty i am not sure what paypal is even for anymore

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

Ive literally never used PayPal. I didnt trust it in the early days, and by the time online shopping was normal there were far easier alternatives.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 5 days ago (10 children)

It's time for Steam to launch their own payment processing company, and apply pressure directly on the card networks and the future competition.

It won't be nearly as profitable as their current business model, but sometimes industries need a shakeup.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

That's not a statement. It's just a lame excuse and attempt to escape the blame for their behavior.

[–] octoblade@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Has anyone else noticed that the MasterCard logo kinda looks like a butt?

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

A fuckable butt at that.

[–] jimjam5@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago
[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago
[–] SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (6 children)

I do kind of wonder of any of these game devs could go after these payment processing companies for loss of income? I'm not a lawyer, but I'd definitely be looking into it if I was a Dev that has been effected by this.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›