this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
232 points (99.6% liked)

Trippin' Through Time

5031 readers
1150 users here now

Tripping' Through Time

A Lemmy community for historic art pieces overhauled into modern memes.

Rules

  1. Only image uploads allowed
  2. Only edited, historical images may be shared
  3. The instance rules of https://lemmy.ca/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Respect to his comrade still cranking his crossbow despite an arrow clean through his thigh.

Edit: I figured this was Crécy, and sure enough: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cr%C3%A9cy

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago

A chainmail booty for each side

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Looks like they didn't work. Still has an ass arrow.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Don't link shame

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 14 points 2 days ago

Oh, to be a history teacher and watch your class walk away with this image as their dominant takeaway thought instead of your carefully crafted lesson.

[–] Rose_Thorne@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When your rallying cry is "WHO LIKES SHORT-SHORTS‽"

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

"WE LIKE SHORT SHORTS!"

[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

Probably "yeah sorry the budget was cut this year so we're only issuing chain mail for your nutsac up, tough economy right now"

[–] MadnessForTsar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Hotchainmail

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

For centuries, men were the ones who wore tights. The wheel may turn again.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It makes sense anatomically. Women store fat on their hips/butts, men store fat on their stomachs. Everyone undergoes swings in weight over time. If you're wearing tights or trousers, they need to fit your butt and thighs reasonably tightly. Men have to undergo a much greater degree of weight change before their pants size changes than women do. A skirt or dress meanwhile much more easily accommodates changes in hip size. Oh, and this is before you consider changes in hip size that come with pregnancy.

It was only really with industrialization that it became practical for women of ordinary means to wear pants or trousers. When clothes are so expensive that you can only afford two or three outfits, and each outfit has to last many years? It wasn't practical for women of ordinary means to afford to wear pants. Men could buy a set of pants and wear them even through ordinary changes in body weight. Men could make it through ordinary swings in body weight with the same set of pants, while women would require many more pairs of pants to cover the same magnitude of weight swing. Skirts and dresses were simply a lot more practical to handle the changes if female hip size that come from ordinary body weight swings.

But with industrialization, clothes became a lot cheaper. It then became practical for women to actually wear pants. If you can practically afford a large number of pants, then you can simply have an assortment of pants to handle swings in hip size from changes in body weight.

The implications about Roman men (who thought that pants were barbaric) are staggering.

[–] bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

dammm that cake! 🤤