Unless you're at the top of the company: You are a wage slave. But this has nothing to do with what you're working on.
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2025
47 points (96.1% liked)
Games
21057 readers
72 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I don’t think anyone who has ever been a corporate executive should be talking about wage slavery. My man lives in a glass house
Bad usage of phrase because they're wage slaves regardless. The talk about continuous royalties that union film industry employees get, that doesn't apply to.game devs regardless anyways. It's just studio royalties but employee turnover. Royalties are for studio owners whether an active employee or investors. Game subscriptions are worse than music because of the lack of worker rights to what they work on. It is true that musicians can at least sell concert tickets and merchandise