this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
44 points (95.8% liked)

Mildly Interesting

23224 readers
97 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is the link working for anybody else? Dead on my end.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

🤷🏻‍♂️ Must be me then.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago

working for me too.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Poor Deborah Norville. She wasn’t Jane Pauley, so everyone hated her.

[–] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago

I understand that photoshop made the technology more accessible to ordinary people, but wasn't superimposing and image editing already possible well before then? (Green screens, double exposures, etc). A sufficiently motivated and skillful person could just paint over an existing photo and take a picture of that. Why are they talking like this is the first time a photograph can be edited in misleading ways?