this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

9 readers
1 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 2 years ago
 

Bill denial for the prescription drug price cap called ‘a major setback’ for diabetics in the state

all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] kungen@feddit.nu 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you not agree with his reasoning? It seems like California will be producing their own insulin, as capping copay prices just makes health insurances gouge patients in other ways or something like that.

[–] Scooter411@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree that it’s just going to be a way for everyone to get higher premiums - but it would also be a way for diabetics to get life saving medication without needing to skip the groceries. That’s a pretty urgent problem. Premiums will go up one way or another.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Copay caps are bullshit anyway. They don't help people with no insurance, and it means the pharma companies still get a ridiculous price, just the insurance pays it - and of course, that's passed on to consumers via higher premiums. The idea of CA making insulin is good, and other than that, it needs a real price cap, not a copay cap.

[–] harmonea@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The context that it's a copay cap only is really important, and I see why it was vetoed - for not going far enough while a viable interim solution is already in place that gives the state breathing room to wait for a more complete solution.

I've been seeing a lot of misleading as hell headlines about this guy's vetoes lately. There was another one yesterday about him vetoing a bill that would have banned caste discrimination, but that one was because CA's anti-discrimination laws already covered discrimination based on ancestry.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Also the one about psilocybin, which was because he said they needed to provide more detail about regulation. Not because he opposed the general concept. Yeah, probably there's a campaign to make him look bad.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'll toss in two more theories:

One, he lost track of the optics of vetoing 3 bills with high visibility and ideological importance to the American left: drug prices, drug decriminalization, and racial discrimination.

Two, the American left has low tolerance for ideological impurity - people are upset that he's not a progressive like Bernie Sanders nor a firebrand like AOC. However, the lack of those two qualities appeals to the middle, it might peel away some disillusioned Republicans. As another commenter said, "pick your battles." Newsom seems to be doing just that.

I'm not saying either of these is more likely than a coordinated effort to discredit him, just that they are other possibilities.