this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
327 points (99.7% liked)

History

5749 readers
4 users here now

Welcome to History!

A community dedicated to sharing and discussing fascinating historical facts from all periods and regions.

Rules:

FOLLOW THE CODE OF CONDUCT

NOTE: Personal attacks and insults will not be tolerated. Stick to talking about the historical topic at hand in your comments. Insults and personal attacks will get you an immediate ban.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tatann@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

One of the dots shouldn't there, just saying

Source : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asterix

[–] CatpainTypo@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I’d have guessed more would have been found in southern Italy.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Can't find them in a place that you don't look.

Rather, that part of Italy might not be interested in looking (or might not be publicizing when they do).

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The reason for that is that people in the heart of the empire didn't feel the need to hoard coins and bury them since they weren't nearly as exposed to barbarian threats (and others) like the areas on the fringes of the empire.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Dude the vast, vast majority of found coins found weren't buried intentionally.

By some estimates there were BILLIONS of Roman coins minted. They're absolutely all over the place.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely true for single finds, but I was talking more about hoards, which are usually more historically interesting. You can see, for example, how people hoarded high quality silver coins from the early imperial or even the republic period instead of spending them, opting to spend the contemporary debased currency instead.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I wonder what data this tracks

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Wow, they did not fuck with Ireland

[–] MoonManKipper@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The potatoes are amazing. Cause real trouble when they run out. /s

Edit: /s added for clarity.

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's a recent development, more recent than any sort of Roman occupation (Potatoes are South American)

[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I know. In hindsight I should have put an “/s” on that comment.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't show the Han/Byzantine trade: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Roman_relations

Roman coins have been found as far east as Vietnam and Japan.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It looks like coins have been found on the sea routes that avoided the Parthian/Sassanian empires, but not on the overland routes. I’m guessing merchants exchanged their coins on the Roman/Persian frontier, east of which the Iranian coinage was the standard anyway; but in politically fractured places like southern India (south of the Kushans and Guptas), Roman coinage became the de facto currency of international trade.

So in other words, the distribution of coins outside the empire could reflect a regional demand for mutually-accepted coinage, rather than Roman trade per se.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Wish I could see a map like this with the finds colored by mint date.

[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 17 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Anybody got some juicy (scientific) context for SW India and Sri Lanka? Commerce I suppose but in details, what, how and when? And how are you BTW?

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 17 points 4 days ago

A fascinating primary source is the Periplus of the Erythraean Sea(link to a complete translation in the article).

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[–] zarixwolfgang@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago

I guess pepper is largely in the "what" mix

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I live kind of in the middle of several finds in an area without any. I wonder if that means there aren't any, or no one has bothered to seriously search for them.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Already have a detector and permit. But I still need permission from the farmers/landowners and that's trickier.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 days ago

Maybe it's up to you to start digging

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

i like how they skipped over saudi arabia but got to yemen some how

[–] d00ery@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wonder if it's down to sea fairing and trade primarily.

[–] Taniwha420@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Yeah, that seems to be the most likely explanation for how the coins got to India too. Egypt was the entry point into the Roman Empire, and there were maritime trade routes from the Red Sea to India.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 days ago

Possible that there aren't as many archeologic diggings there

Aden in Yemen has been a major port for the trade route to India since at least the time of the ancient Greeks.

[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 days ago

Amazing, thanks a lot.

[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Very cool map I haven't seen before, thank you!

It's so strange to me that the Romans went through central Europe, were they just taking the land route to the sea nations up north?

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yes—the Amber Road, the main trade route to the Baltic, did go through Central Europe.

And the reason trade went overland instead of by sea is because the Romans weren’t trading directly with the Baltic—they were paying soldiers stationed along the Danube and Rhine who then traded with neighboring peoples (and also directly subsidizing some frontier tribes), and the frontier peoples of Central Europe were then trading Roman gold for Baltic amber.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Southern Italy has always been poor. Water, infrastructure and so on

How Italy Became the Most Divided Country in Europe

[–] FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus 2 points 3 days ago

The source of the map is not provided in the OOP.

I think it’s very likely this map is biased in reporting.

I’ve heard roman coins are really common in some southern regions of italy. Perhaps to the point where finding them isn’t reported, and doesn’t end up on this map.

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Well after Rome fell the currency was worthless, what else would you do with them? I mean it took 1500 years for them to be worth more than the metal they were minted on.

[–] tychosmoose@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Not worthless. The coinage had intrinsic value, being made of metals with a commodity value. So it's not like holding a paper banknote when a government collapses. People would still have used them to hoard savings, for trade and melted down as a source of precious metals.

That was really the only value they ever had. Boosted a bit by confidence in the purity (but also reduced when Rome debased its coinage).