this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
287 points (93.6% liked)

solarpunk memes

4223 readers
6 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Neato@kbin.social 48 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Hyperloop was invented to try to kill light rail. It succeeded at killing Maryland's new venture and Illinois'. Neither were built because Hyperloop promised bullshit. Elon hates public transport.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Elon's main thing is selling cars, of course he actively opposes whatever would let people not buy a car.

[–] gatelike@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

guy who sells cars spreads FUD about competition to cars

[–] corship@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

He didn't even invent it.

[–] wowbagger_@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Wait, what did Hyperloop kill in MD? It looks like the proposed route was from DC to Baltimore underneath MD 295 – we already have Amtrak and MARC serving that corridor.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] red@sopuli.xyz 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ya all looking at this like it's a conspiracy. It's just a guy looking to sell more cars. Shame on anyone who thought it's a real thing.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago

I'm looking at China like this-

[–] Peaty@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 years ago (4 children)

China has the advantage of not having to care about the citizens' desires in regards to be relocated to make the rail possible.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Kelo v. City of New London. That's all you need to know about the US' "care" for citizens' desires as far as eminent domain is concerned.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

They also provide apartments to live in permanently for those displaced in the development.

Meanwhile, the US has not built high speed rail and has tent cities.

In the case of national infrastructure, China wins hands down.

Although it's kind of ridiculous to compare California with an entire country...

[–] sweeny@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Honestly not that ridiculous of a comparison considering California's size and GDP, we could be doing a lot better

[–] Peddlephile@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] clutch@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

Except it is considered "unamerican" for government to help people, and tue generosity of billionaires is hoped for instead

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Spain wants to have a little chat with you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 years ago (4 children)

This is misleadingly reductionist. California high speed rail has made consistant progess in that time. That progress has been slower than ourslowest expectations. It demonstrates the void of expertise the US has in rail megaprojects. However, that expertise is being built, slowly and painfully. Its still forward progress for a nation which tore up half its rail overthe last 50 years.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

America invented rail megaprojects.

America still has the largest rail network by far. It's well more than twice the size of China's.

The only interesting note is that it's almost all freight compared to other nations' use of passenger rail.

[–] corship@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Hehehehe

With 0.92% of electrified rail it's a joke to say that NGL. Absolute numbers are meaningless.

You have to see it into perspective per area then you'll get to feel how dense and therefore useful the rail network actually is. Because what good is a rail network if you can't reach your desired location.

And then you'll see that swiss, Germany and Luxembourg for example end up with less than 10 square km per km of rail while the usa has around 40.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Thats true. And then America stopped. And then the people who had actual on-the-ground experiance died of old age. Its really another effect of the slow tragedy that is the auto industry

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Album@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Misleadingly reductionist is what /c/memes should be renamed to.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

California HSR expansion is going to get cancelled the moment the minimum viable route finishes, they're going to lose the ROW and the expertise, then 10 years later the next leg will get approved.

This is what happens to transit projects in America, so there's no reason to expect anything different for rail.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Indeed. We're fixing the great car mistake at a glacialy slow pace

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The mistake is thinking Elon is a moron screwing everything up on accident. He isn’t. He’s an Afrikaner white supremacist Nazi who is causing all this damage on purpose.

Starlink and SpaceX should be nationalized before he gets a chance to weaponize those companies against the western world as well.

[–] Filthmontane@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

He literally came up with the hyperloop because he was afraid of a high speed rail hurting Tesla sales.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

China wants unity, even in places where it doesn't make economic sense.

edit: 100% downvotes are coming from people that don't know the situation. The CCP wants fast travel to major population centers even when the rail line isn't profitable.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago

It makes economic sense but not financial sense. Railways are almost always profitable once considering second and third order effects.

It's the same story with Amtrak, so I'm not sure why people are so confused. Amtrak loses money on every train that's not the NEC.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Isn't that a good thing? sounds like the rail is being run as a public utility rather than a business. And its still likely profitable if you average the cost over all the lines.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blamemeta@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)

Its a lot easier when you have slave labor and don't care about the enviroment or human lives

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (12 children)

It's much easier to build rail in places that weren't designed around cars. Even in rural China people live in condos and apartments with parks between. This helps with NIMBYism and combined with the already large amount of green space left in Chinese cities such systems can be built with the only real concern being the engineering itself. But China is also in a good position for that, as their workforce is incredibly well educated with more engineering talent than they can even fully employ domestically. All that PLUS the political will of a single party state meant it was a very different situation than California.

And that's before you even consider ridership, where even the best possible SF to LA route would still pretty much require you to get a car or taxi once you get to LA (because LA was basically torn down and redesigned for cars).

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago

In LA it is supposed to end at Union Station, which amazing access to commuter rail, a metro system, which admitly is small, but still can take you to a lot of places, bus rapid transit and it is right next to downtown. Obviously it is not comparable to NY, London or Paris, which are of a similar size, but you should be able to go to a lot of intressting places, without needing a car once you arrive in LA.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

LA is slowly working on good rail transit. You can already get to Union station (where CA HSR will stop) from just about everywhere served by the rail and busway network

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›