this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
81 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

4480 readers
105 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Ok let's try this another way. I'm going to leave the room and I promise there won't be any recordings. When I leave just say out loud what the positives are of AI ok?"

(Leaves.)

"I get to fire all my employees and keep all the money for myself!"

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago

That’s only if it actually works. Which…it doesn’t.

see, we pour money into this hole, magic happens, and then we fire large chunks of our workforce while ignoring the consequences of hollowing out nuanced domain knowledge; it’s quite an efficient system for saving money in the near term.

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago

Step 3 is profit

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

The FT has used AI tools to identify these mentions of the technology in SEC 10-k filings and earnings transcripts, then to categorise each mention. The results were then checked and analysed to help draw a nuanced picture about what companies were saying to different audiences about the technology.

So... using AI to find out who is using AI and warn of underuse of AI.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The title and the article don’t match, like…..at all. The article states that all the biggest companies absolutely can state and show how AI is extremely useful to them.

[–] msage@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They did not say what the biggest companies use the AI for.

Article said companies in the server supply chain are happy, and that executives are happy, and some companies not using LLMs have actual use cases, but that's it.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It didn’t say anything about companies in the “server supply chain” being happy. It also said……well not much really. Nothing that could support the title.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are you talking about this line?

Big Tech giants such as Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon and Meta have regularly extolled AI’s benefits, pledging to invest $300bn this year alone to develop the infrastructure around large language models.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Big Tech giants such as Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon and Meta have regularly extolled AI’s benefits,

Are you saying that you don't know what these companies use AI for?

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No. What I'm asking is if this is the line you were referring to. I wasn't sure. If it is, these companies have a vested interest in "extolling AI's benefits". But if you're not talking about this line, I don't want to jump to conclusions. That's why I asked.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm referring to the fact that they specifically exclude the biggest companies because they know they can state and show what they use AI for and how it benefits them.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Did they put that information in their filings? Because that was the analysis. I don't know if they did or didn't. If they did, then your assertion would be correct. If they didn't though, it would not be correct.

[–] One_Honest_Dude@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Freeport-McMoran, which has a stockpile of copper, stated that “data centres and artificial intelligence developments” would support the metal’s price. The company also said the technology can help with material characterisation and mineral extraction. Equipment manufacturer Caterpillar reported that its energy business was benefiting from supporting “data centre growth related to cloud computing and generative artificial intelligence”.