this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
1080 points (98.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

13644 readers
235 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 101 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago

Oh wow. They did the math.

[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 78 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

They really should be! They're like cockroaches here in Alberta...they're everywhere.

[–] Fyurion@lemmy.world 71 points 2 weeks ago

I know right, children are the worst

[–] coaxil@lemmy.zip 74 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Emotional support vehicles, lol

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 47 points 2 weeks ago

Gender Affirming

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 51 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Since I live in a place where driving is necessary (Texas), I drive a smaller electric car.

From my perspective, even small SUVs are far too big. If I'm behind them at a light, I can't see when the light changes.

I was recently surprised to learn that in other countries, they have popular versions of pickup trucks that are smaller than almost anything you can find here in the states.

Anybody who buys a vehicle that size in OP's picture would have to be a sociopath. They do not consider how other people are affected by their selfish actions.

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

From my perspective, even small SUVs are far too big. If I'm behind them at a light, I can't see when the light changes.

Have you tried stopping further back? Works with lorries too. Also means you have room to manoeuvre without reversing if the vehicle breaks down.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The general rule is that you should be able to see the rear tyres of the car in front. If you can't, you're too close.

[–] Dragonborn3810@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I'm learning to drive at the moment and my instructor tells me I should be able to see tyres on tarmac when stopping.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

*fucking. You can say fucking on the internet. Don't worry, we won't tell your mommy.

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I didn't know, fuck you very much ! :-)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I always get nervous whenever i see one of these new GM pickups cuz they are just wayy too tall.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago

And you know the driver's not a bright spark.

[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 weeks ago

btw when they blind me at night going 75 mph in the rocky mountains, i find it to be deadly too.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

If I recall my driver's ed, most current "rules of the road" (such as leave a two second gap) are based around WW2 tank driving regulations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The solution will never be ending the obvious problem, but rather replacing windshields with giant LCDs using front mounted cameras or something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] magic_internet_wizard@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But how will I advertise how insecure I am about my small wiener if I can't drive a monster with five gallons to the mile on diesel?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abfarid@startrek.website 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

THE NEW MAIBATSU MONSTROSITY

Why drive a small car? Are you a small person? The new SUV Maibatsu Monstrosity guzzles gas and is equipped for crossing Arctic tundra! Driving one will make you feel good!

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm not alone in thinking of this every time I see a gigantic vehicle.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

YSK you can say "fuck" on the internet

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Especially on the fediverse, we don't have corporate sponsors, who want us to be sterilized.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

We should start packing nitroglycerin into kids backpacks to force drivers to be more careful. Sure, some kids would die unnecessarily but dead children seems to be a price Americans are very willing to pay.

[–] cabb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sure but what if some parents are too lazy or bad with money to be able to buy their children nitroglycerin without receiving government handouts? I don't want my tax dollars helping strangers kids.

/s seems necessary here

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I concur.

No more creepy mannequins.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

yeah, I thought OP was struggling with some dark thoughts before I realized what sub it was.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cynar@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Trying to ban them would be extraordinarily difficult. A potential solution would be to push to reclassify them as trucks, under trucking regulations (I'm unsure how this is done in the US). Once you need a tachograph and a requirement to keep driving records, it would cut back on sales. It also still allows "legitimate" usage. This would weaken the argument against the change.

Basically anything where you can't see a 5 year old within 0.5m of your bumper should be under "truck" rules, not "car" rules.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

For this purpose, it’s not a question of banning them, but adding pedestrian safety regulations. You can still build these monstrosities while also providing better visibility and less likelihood for victims to be run over.

It’s just banning the “wall” of the front. That’s only required as a style choice and style should not trump safety

I’ve actually been paying more attention lately since my brother bought a Chevy ~~Behemoth~~ Silverado EV. As a big and tall guy I’m used to being bigger than most people I encounter, but looking at the “wall” at the front of these vehicles, it is also well above my center of mass. I would also be thrown down and run over. It’s not just children but there really is no “big enough” to survive getting hit with those

(And yes I will keep giving my brother a hard time. After All these years of owning a house and large property where he could have argued he needed a truck, he gets one after he gave up that property. He bought this monstrosity to commute alone and do road trips alone. Nothing to tow. Nothing to haul.)

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

“Nothing to to tow, nothing to haul.” is so typical. And when they do it’s something even a sedan could pull or a van would have been better for. And then they’ll claim they want winter safety even as I comfortably rip by them in a blizzard with my goddamn BRZ(partly because I actually bought winter tires and they think their frozen “all-terrain” tires are good enough).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

I'm feeling similarly. Require a minimum sight lines for shorter humans in front of the vehicle, and lower weight/size limitations on vehicles for a standard Class D license, and a short 1-2 year grandfather period for folks who already own a vehicle that they'll require additional licensing to continue driving so that they can either trade it or get their ducks in a row and continue driving their vehicle legally.

These gigantic trucks and SUVs are unacceptable on our roads and they keep adding extra wear to our roads due to the increased weight, require larger parking spaces and of course are far more deadly to those outside of the vehicle in any kind of collision. They need to be regulated back into the niches their classes were originally designed to fill.

And for those saying "oh but I need a bed for this that and the other" guess what? you can buy a trailer. Drive around an efficient vehicle then hook up an 8 foot trailer (bigger than basically any truck bed these days!) when you need to haul shit

[–] mereo@piefed.ca 19 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Doing groceries is a heavy duty task!

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

There’s a sardonic chuckle from me every time I pass an SUV stopped at a red light in the bike lane…while carrying more groceries in my saddle bags than all of its combined cargo.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought this was about the freaky little mankins, I was like "yeah they're freaky, but banned is a bit harsh" then I saw that the background was a modern truck grille, not a building.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hash@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 weeks ago

First time I sat in the passenger seat of one I was still shocked. it's even more frustrating that if you actually need to tow something heavy you have no option to avoid this outside an older truck. Some manufacturer should clue in and advertise a 3/4 ton as that won't make you kill the neighbor's kid. And I want sightlines, not cameras.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

12 yards long, 2 lanes wide, 65 tons of American pride!

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Four wheel drive, smells like a steak and seats thirty-five!

[–] strcrssd@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

No, never. That would scream mass transit, or the B(us) word. Unacceptable. Think of all the unclean, dirty people with darker skin that I would be forced to look at unfairly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 12 points 2 weeks ago

Cars are dangerous enough. Deathbox has gotta go.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago (16 children)

Well, I assume the idea is to see the children before they're that close....

That being said, from my small vehicle I could probably tell what shoes someone is wearing from the same distance that the driver of one of these monstrosities can barely tell their hair color.

I get why trucks exist, I just don't get why so many people drive them as their primary or only vehicle when they don't regularly haul anything more than groceries.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Well, I assume the idea is to see the children before they're that close....

It is, but that does not help you when you stop to talk with the neighbour and their child runs in front of your car while you don't see.

It should at least be mandatory to have a front & rear facing cameras and proximity sensors for cars like this.

[–] flippinfreebird@lemmy.today 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

EPA regulations on emissions, in relation to size, caused light trucks (and the SUVs based on them) to grow to the size you see. Ironically, the fuel efficient small pickup trucks and SUVs we grew up with in the 80s and 90s don't meet modern standards. I die a little inside every time I see one of the Nissan trucks, like the one I totaled. ;_;

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 10 points 2 weeks ago

They don't even sell the Chevy Colorado where I live. Too small for the demographic here, who needs the biggest truck on the market with aftermarket lift kits.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Why do our car manufacturers here even remotely think this is okay?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago

Because it's legal for them to kill us but illegal for us to kill them back.

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 weeks ago

They don't think it's okay, but neither do they care. They want money even if it means killing kids.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›