LinkedinLunatics

This guy apparently doesn’t understand the first and second laws of thermodynamics. However, in his defense, this is sorta how regenerative braking works, but with less complexity.

I had this exact idea... when I was 7. That was before I was introduced to newtonian physics.

Wow, excessive emojis and em-dashes... Not ai at all

Why not cut out the middle man and directly charge battery 2 with battery 1? Switch and repeat.

Either he's lying about being a mechanical engineer or the barrier to entry to become a mechanical engineer is embarrassingly low.

It this guy seriously proposing a perpetual motion machine for the purposes of EV charging? Also not that it really matters but who the hell has range anxiety on an electric bicycle. You get 30 miles out of those things easily, what sort of bike rides is he doing where you have to recharge that more than once a month?

He should try recharging a solar panel with a light powered by the solar panel. Just achieving infinite power.

Someone has been spending too much time on ChatGPT.

This has to be a parody account right?

Techbros rediscovering old principles, a tale as old as....well, since the tech industry.

A mechanical engineering student that doesn't know the law of energy conservation?

With this many emojis and em dashes, he's probably engagement farming using llm content, regardless of the thermodynamics gaps in logic

It's almost as if one object perpetually moves something that creates a form of motion perpetually to continuously move that first item. Like a continuous motion machine or perpetual movement apparatus. Something like that. I feel like my naming is close, though.

Yes, many electric bicycles power themselves while going down hills or costing. As for the other idea that you could recharge them just by pedaling ... That exists already. Almost nobody wants it because it's easier to plug your bicycle in. The point of the electric bicycle is to do less work, not to do more. Otherwise you would get a regular bicycle because it weighs less.

This guy is only telling us part of the truth. You actually need three batteries. The third battery is hooked up to a solar and wind generator. Only then can you achieve true energy independence.

Does he have a fundme or patreon page? I think it's worth supporting his research if it can be applied to cars and trains one day.

If somebody is an airplane engineer, is it possible to do something like that with planes? It would be great if planes could become environmentally friendly with such technologies.

There was this browser game (on the BBC website IIRC) with a Wallace and Gromit theme, in which you build stuff.
It had a level in which you make a vehicle-ish contraption and see how far it goes ^[or more like whatever contraption you can make to get the dummy to go as far as possible. Could even be a cannon, launching the dummy.]. I managed to setup a motor and generator in such a way that it effectively increased the vehicle's range by quite a bit.
I don't remember well enough now, but I think the generator didn't give as much resistance as the energy it was creating.

I had this idea 30 years ago lol. Bicycling in headwinds in windy and flat Denmark gives you a lot of time to think of dumb shit like that, like what if I put small wind turbines on my bike which generated electricity to give me a boost?

We've had windmills as part of the landscape here for a long time after all, so it wasn't exactly rocket science to think that one up.