this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
84 points (98.8% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

5190 readers
653 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Estos colores son horribles.

[–] gigachad@piefed.social 12 points 2 days ago

Also the legend colors don't match the colors used in the map

[–] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is this map part of American propaganda to bomb mexico next?

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nah, it still says "Gulf of Mexico". Besides, the current administration is fine with cartels unless they're run by democrats. Then it's a shithole and we need to send in the forces and forcefully spread all that freedom and dispense some indiscriminate justice they didn't ask for.

[–] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

propaganda and consent manufacturing can be made on outdated maps. Now that the US government is on a warpath against the drug cartels every foreign country can pay for the fact that the american people does a lot of drugs.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 days ago

según varios estudios, dan empleo al menos a 175.000 personas, convirtiendo a los cárteles mexicanos en el quinto mayor empleador del país

Economists hate this one trick to reduce unemployment

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Do you prefer the Jalisco Original Series or the New generation?

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Original, less cannibalism. Prefiero los originales, menos comiendo del gente. Demasiado picante.

Aaiiiii Jalisco no te rajes,

Me sale del alma

cantar con calor!!!!

that's about so I know any Jalisco courtesy of the tres Caballeros

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Rugged mountanious areas are naturally resistant to state control. Afghanistan has the same issue.

It's more expensive, slower and more difficult to extended and maintain domination over a patchwork of mountain valleys and passes than over lowlands.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 8 points 3 days ago

Sad Welsh noises

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is there a place in Mexico that cartels haven't claimed for some reason?

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

according to the map, apparently: "baja intensidad de cárteles" means (according to my rusty Spanish) "low intensity of cartels"

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Interesting. Wonder why. I don't know much about Mexico's different regions, so I should probably do that.

[–] klu9@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

In the past, when it was almost completely about drugs, their activities were concentrated in two types of area:

  • transit corridors (coasts, ports and US border)
  • growing areas (e.g. poppy fields in the mountains of west, like Michoacán, Guerrero)

That left a strip up the centre less affected (e.g. Puebla, Edomex, Queretaro).

Now that they've leveraged decades of drug money to expand into other enterprises (e.g. extortion), they've expanded into other geographical areas too. But the remains of that central strip can still be seen on the map with white & whitish areas.

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

¡Una sorpresa! ¿Donde estan los Zetas? Tengo la impresíon que Zetas tienen el poder de la estados cerca de Nuevo Laredo por muchos años.

[–] garfaagel@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Según Wikipedia ya no existe, debido a conflictos internos y la captura de varios líderes.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Que yo sepa han sido derrotados. Al menos yo llevó mucho sin oír de ellos.