this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
212 points (99.5% liked)

Canada

10576 readers
473 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago
[–] orioler25@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Hm, wonder why they didn't go along with the "No Kings" tagline.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ol' Charles visited us in May. He's our King of Canada but he's kind of mid.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We should bring the Queen back. She was a laugh.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

They're all worse than mid.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know you are pointing out the irony.

However, the US associates kings with tyrants as that was the basis for the US revolution but Canada does not.

Canadians do not learn about a point in Canadian history where the tyranny of the throne was a problem. In modern times, the monarchy has mostly been viewed favourably. In the fight against modern tyrants (eg. Donald Trump), the English crown is seen as an ally. Canada invites the King to speak on behalf of the Canadian government (throne speech).

So Canada has no problem with kings. Canada takes issue with tyranny though. So there is no “dissonance” as your other comment implies.

In the US, King George III is remembered as a tyrant that the US successfully defeated and declared independence from in 1776.

When Canadians think of the same period in history (the reign of King George III), they think “that is when we successfully fought off the Americans and burned down the White House.”

Those are two pretty different perspectives.

Ironically, the modern US is mostly positive about the Brittish monarchy. Princess Diana was loved in the US. President Trump is a big fan of Ling Charles.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Mhmhmhmhmhm, what about inidgenous peoples who suffer genocide under British rule? Every British monarch is the inheritor of brutal, genocidal colonialism.

I wish you knew how funny it is to confidently misexplain history to me. Won't be paying attention to you again.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Because Canada does have a special version of a king. This mod from king to tyrant should be expected.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Yes. I am making fun of the dissonance in that.

[–] Thalion@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

No Gods or Kings. Only man.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’d like to see the venn diagram of no tyrants and the kkklownvoy

[–] r8KNzcU8TzCroexsE2xbWC@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)