this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
337 points (90.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

37799 readers
1302 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Stupid ass private education bullshit

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] elbiter@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I guess you're talking about the US.

Well, everything costs money there: education, health, safety... It's capitalist dystopia.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

In Australia University used to be free. At some point they realised that Asia is close and has a virtually limitless supply of rich parents who want to pay big money for their kids to be lawyers and doctors.

Education is now one of Australia's main exports.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

same in US, most of them seek out international rich students, and you can see how much of these from the middle east and asian coming in with thier expensive cars to campus everyday. at the same time they neglect the rest of the students, so they dont prepare them for thier career track as there is very little resources directing to the departments, just enough to get by so the Professors and staff dont "revolt", they also abuse the adjunct positions to avoid paying them full time, or more benefits, if they can replace all the instructors with masters or BS level educations they would instead of getting PHDs. it all goes to wooeing international students, and sports. stem needs lab work as experience, but its so limited and small most graduating dont even know about it, or its extremely hard to get into. you can tell the university is being cheap if they use overworked professors to do advising.

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Formal education isn't for education but for the formal paper. There is so much information on the web, just learn from that. Also, libraries often times have material other than physical books

[–] sobchak@programming.dev 4 points 4 hours ago

Formal education can be good for guidance. For learning the "unknown unknowns" as a famous scholar once said. Also, in terms of career, networking is the most important thing. The world is built on nepotism, unfortunately.

[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 26 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It doesn’t.

It takes time and effort to gain more knowledge. It has never been cheaper or more accessible to acquire knowledge than it is today.

To increase your intelligence, is another matter all together.

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

I would also add that damn near all of human information is free to be had on the internet for the low, low price of a monthly broadband bill. The real expense comes when you want a piece of paper that says you know all this that other people will take seriously.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

It only costs money to get the little piece of paper that says you did the thing and are therefore smarter. 🙃

[–] DegenerationIP@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Thats about certificated stuff from school. Knowledge has never been more accessible than today.

[–] tea@lemmy.today 3 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

It is wild to me that tuition is SO expensive and quality educational content is SO ubiquitous now. It does take a lot of time, skill, and effort to provide quality educational experiences, but man is it weird that it is simultaneously free and ridiculously overpriced.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

our state schools in the wests, apparently were suffering from enrollment deficiencies so they decided to raise tuition (equivalent to dorms), covid exposed unmasked the problem with the schools thats been ongoing before the pandemic. basically people were graduating in the early-mid or late pandemic and they dint learn anything or dint have a chance to get any experience, so they all but criticized the schools, and probably warned thier family hs students away from university.

as of recently the state universities started to enticing hs students of early easier admissions, if they complete these x amount of courses. I dint follow up if the tuition is higher for these students as well. Some students criticized these state school, transferred to a more prestigious university for better opportunities. what universities need to do for stem is increasing the resources for LAB WORK, like make opportunities for more lap spaces,,etc, this is the most important part of a major.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

University is overpriced, but a degree isn't just saying that you've gained knowledge. Being able to look up and memorize stuff doesn't mean you'll be good employee. if you can't work effectively with a team or tend not to finish a project all the knowledge in the world means nothing.

The most important thing most degrees demonstrate is that you can work for years on a project with multiple milestones involving multiple disciplines, work with others or self-direct, and meet goals.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

alot of people fall into the trap of easy degree, like psychology, a studies/arts degree. yea you arnt going anywhere with a psych degree, if your not academically preparing for grad school like PSY-D, or psychology doctorate. i witnessed quite a few people that got a degree, and then complain about it. i had a cousin that did her psych degree properly, she has a PSY-D a while a go.

there is a suggestion going around in other forums,communities, that schools should start holding talks or seminars about different majors, and thier job prospects, but we know they wouldnt, because it would scare people away from these degrees that are money makers and coporations can abuse/exploit low wages for many fields.

[–] tea@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, agreed. Definitely value there. I feel like a huge part of university is demonstrating the ability to learn and apply oneself. So many people have success (like myself) in areas that they did not major in.

One thing that I think is actually an argument for big state schools vs private, more expensive lib arts schools is that the big state schools provide you skills in navigating "a System" and that does help when you get into the real world and the damn corporate rat race. Smaller liberal art schools might have more academic competition maybe, but less bureaucratic competition, in many cases. In many cases bureaucratic navigation skills, which are often more valuable in job applicants IRL.

Most impressive are folks that have gathered both the book smarts and the world navigation smarts without the need of higher education institutions and carved their path without going into huge debt or getting carried by rich parents who paid for their degree.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 4 hours ago

we had a bunch of gifted students in HS, or high performing, i believe we only had 1 gifted per semester/class. they were "paraded around" the school like they were best of the school, while at the same time neglecting the underperfoming struggling students, which is quite a large part of the student body.

[–] Ultraword@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago

It was never about paying to get smarter. The original purpose of universities/higher education is long gone. It is now about paying to be accepted by high society and indoctrinating you. As Rockefeller said, I want a nation of workers, not thinkers.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

There are a lot more quality free learning resources than people realise.

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Honestly, there isn't hardly anything you couldn't learn on your own. But what higher education provides is structure. It can be very difficult to actually follow through with the education if you do not have scheduled classes, exams you have to study for, deadlines for projects/exams, etc

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 4 hours ago

depends on the subject, math, engineering, stem need school, plus you cant really do experiments/ or lab work/procedures at home.

[–] stonkage@aussie.zone 3 points 9 hours ago

One of the reasons some branches of learning are called "disciplines"

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 11 hours ago

Where im from we have libraries and the internet. Now getting job skills. that is a tough one.

[–] Themosthighstrange@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago

The library is free, my dude

[–] Thoven@lemdro.id 5 points 13 hours ago

Essentially, because it takes labor to create educational material. Unless you own slaves labor isn't free. And in fact with the modern library and Internet access I'd argue self educating is more accessible than ever in history.

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 21 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (4 children)

I would argue that its rare for education to make you smarter, it mostly makes you more knowlegable.

Knowledge is mostly free though. You can get it from the internet, from the library etc. A lot of what you are paying for is the certification - some places let you just sit the exam I think.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Yuuuup. Piece of paper literally to get a higher paying job. Only says you attended school, doesn't mean you learned anything or built skills there.

[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Exactly. Smarter doesn't equate well educated.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 11 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

*in the US. In Germany a semester at my university costs about 300 Euros and that includes cheaper lunch and a ticket to use all public transport in the whole of Germany.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Private lessons don't make you smarter. They just make you more well equipped with.

I am a lifetime student. I am not smarter. I am not a smarty pant

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 4 hours ago

1 on 1 is definitely more beneficial than 1 teacher to 100+ students.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Gatekeeping education.

Keep the rich rich and the poor poor.

The rich got theirs and it's a ladder they can pull up to stay wealthy.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

worst, gatekeeping many fields, especially some stem fields. bio research, and biotech is one such thing. very difficult if your even lucky to find a lab in your school that has space for volunteering. and i noticed alot professors are extremely reluctant to share info about thier labs for volunteering, must be done before graduation. i dare say it, also its hidden from students knowledge. another development is bio major is mostly geared towards the female student demographic now all the way to grad school too. the ratio is 60%/40% in number of degrees held by woman vs men(for bio), and more of them are getting MS or higher too. right now phd is still legacy of men, but it will soon change.

load more comments
view more: next ›