A bisexual. A single woman with dyed pink
And she voted Republican? Despite winning the EMT of the year award - which probably takes a lot of brain - she does not seem to be the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree.
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
156 points (97.6% liked)
politics
26135 readers
3354 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
In 2016, Trump was a wildcard while Hillary Clinton was... Hillary Clinton. With the suspicious omission of the years after 2016 I'm guessing she didn't vote Trump after that.
Trump wasn't a wildcard by the time 2016 voting began
We all knew he was a criminal, we all knew he grabbed them by the pussy and liked to walk into little girls dressing rooms, we knew he was a fraud, we knew all his enterprises failed. We knew he was disrespectful to anyone being even slightly different.
There was little wild about his card by then
Trump's appeal was that he was unqualified, that he instead campaigned by bringing reality show tactics into politics full-scale, winning endless free airtime ("all exposure is good exposure") for exactly the reasons you mentioned. Back then this idea had a sheen, like how "We're going to build a wall" resonated with those close to Mexico. I agree that in hindsight everything seems obvious.
we knew he was a fraud, we knew all his enterprises failed
I don't think we did. That seems to be first reported in 2018 and 2021.
I don't think we did. That seems to be first reported in 2018 and 2021.
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you live in places that Trump has not marked with his greasy mitts. People who lived in places where "Trump" buildings were planted, and thus he was part of local news, knew he was a dickhead. The average person just didn't know how much he failed because most don't go digging into the financial history of celebrities.
If you lived anywhere near NYC you knew he was a dickhead.
Yes. We have to acknowledge democrats keep running "fall in line" candidates and there's a significant amount of people in the US that refuse to play that game.
Bernie would have won.
There is no good reason to post your true opinions about anything even remotely controversial under your real name. I don't know why people feel so compelled to do it. If I employed her in a position of public trust within the community, and firefighter is pretty high up on that list, I'd fire her too.
But the guy who led a mob to dox her is the worst: claiming some false pious burden while going against the literal commands of Jesus and stirring up hatred that would obviously lead to death threats against her and her family. It hardly comes as a surprise, though; that's typical of Christian reactionaries.
I would never fire her. I don't give into terrorists and Christian nationalists are exactly that. You have a second amendment right as well.
It's not about "giving into terrorists," it's about losing community trust when you work in a position of trust.
“Good riddance. Thoughts and prayers to the other guy.”
If Bernie or AOC were brutally murdered and it was caught on video and a firefighter or EMT posted something that callous immediately afterward, that would inspire questions in the community about whether or not that person would feel the same way if they knew the politics of someone calling emergency services. It's a breach of professionalism in a position that requires community trust.
If you want to broadcast controversial, callous opinions when you work in a position like that, do it somewhere not tied to your name.
Got a link that doesn't need a log in?
Archive.is is your go to for bypassing paywalls on articles.
It's a gift article link, it should not ask for a log-in.
I just clicked on the link and it didn't ask for a login.