this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
802 points (99.5% liked)

politics

26203 readers
2650 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A society is always about 3 days of hunger away from a violent revolution. Start your clocks.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 55 points 6 days ago (13 children)

Fact: absolutely none of this would have happened if Kamala had won.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 14 points 6 days ago (9 children)

Shame she decided to support wildly unpopular policy and messaging instead of winning.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 days ago

I hated that she sounded like a politician dodging questions with nonsense answers. She should have been direct and stopped worrying about being a different direction than Biden.

But yes with all those flaws she would have been better than Trump by miles.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

But she was going to kill Palestinians with her bare hands!

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But uh but shes a woman. A brown woman. The horror,!

fun fact: i think it has nothing to do with it. it's just that trump is a reality tv star and tv stars and entertainers tend to get elected in democracies (see england, italy, USA) because they know how to present themselves to the people in an "entertaining" way and also because harris refused to focus on the real buying power of people.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Good, it is completely unnecessary. It's a bad solution to an old problem that already has much better solutions out there that are much more accessible too. They only made it so people will rely on them for everything and stop trusting others, but thankfully it failed. Canonical should be ashamed of themselves for ever trying this snap thing.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Risky joke, woosh is very likely.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] madjo@feddit.nl 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's a joke on how "Snap" is also an application distribution system for Linux. Ubuntu (by the company Canonical) uses it.

Wrong. It's a system for killing half the people in the universe to decrease overpopulation

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arandomthought@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 days ago

Fuck... I was squinting so hard up until I read that last sentence.

[–] NotBillMurray@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

God, and I can't say this with my entire chest, fucking dammit. You got me.

[–] Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 6 days ago

This is just outrageous. I'll have you know there are many single-mothers who depend on snap day-to-day. You can't honestly expect them to just switch distros.

[–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago

Hah. I was ready to rage comment until I finished reading your whole comment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 51 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This administration needs to be concerned about what happens when you have millions of people with nothing to lose anymore.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

yhea they want escalation.

but that doesn't mean the best strategy is to do nothing.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Totally. But they have been begging for "Civil War". Like it's some Hero's Journey and people won't die. It's so short sided and dumb I can't believe they actually believe it's for the better.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

You can only get your civil war if there are two clear sides, divisible by geography and cultural lines.

When you just have a widespread, starving population, you get mobs and mass riots and government leadership dragged out of their homes and offices.

I am not sure at all what their game is. I know they want the chaos but surely they can't be so dumb that they think this will.... oh yeah, lol caught myself there. They're that dumb.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

DT is probably just thinking back fondly of his last visit to North Korea.

"Hey, what if I did that?!"

mate, it's fascism, would you tell the french resistance against nazis to chill, because nazis want an excuse to escalate?

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

It's mostly red states that get food stamps. ....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

SNAP has traditionally been entirely federally funded, but is administered by states. That means the shutdown's impact on SNAP and when benefits will start to dry up will vary state by state.

So about those government contracts for immigration, you would think some of those states that raked in a lot of money, could perhaps use that ill-gotten money to at least benefit the residents of their states.

Funny that Florida got more than half a billion dollars from the government the day before the shutdown, but they just can't find it within their hearts or their budget to use any of that money to feed families relying on food stamps in their state. Wonder where it's going instead?

[–] PillowTalk420@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Wonder where it's going instead?

Alligators with freakin' laser beams attached to their heads for Alligator Alcatraz.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] madjo@feddit.nl 12 points 6 days ago (3 children)

This will destroy the US economy. I hope you like standing in bread lines...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's mostly going to be the elderly who suffer. People just forget about old people. They can't get out and go stand in line at food pantries.

Sometimes they don't have anyone checking on them very often.

Most don't know how to get online and find services and such.

If you have an elderly neighbor or family member. Try to check with them and see if they need help.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If only it was the elderly people in the government that suffered.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah kids and disabled people too. I just always think of the elderly cause they get forgotten about.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The leopards! They hunger!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

this is a disaster for the people affected (and also every society is 3 days without food before violent revolutions and all that) but also IMO these programs should ideally be paid for by the states anyways, not the federal government. i also think that taxes should go to the states instead of the federal government, and the states then forward whatever amount is appropriate to the federal government. that would make the states more resilient against these kinds of federal fraud.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Both sides.

BOOoOoTh SiIiiiiIIiiiiiiDESssssssssSsS!!

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Biden is old, you see, and there was also a woman who wasn't exactly adamant about Israel, so you have to starve now. But don't worry, if you starve enough, something will surely happen. And if not, at least there will be a civil war, isn't that great? You get to die in a random shootout, isn't that wonderful? So glad we didn't vote so this lady didn't win.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (3 children)

True, but as for the last part -

we didn’t vote

We actually did. The even more depressing reality is the last three presidential elections had the highest turnout of registered voters and young voters in American history.

What's fucked up is that exit polling showed that most people were entirely tuned-out and saw no difference between the candidates because most people don't watch the news or politics, most people are uninformed on basic science and reason, most people have curated social media feeds that push attention-span erosion and right-wing propaganda, and a good QUARTER of the adult population of America is functionally illiterate. Meaning studies have shown that 22% or more of adults in the US cannot read more than a couple words strung together or have to piece together sentences contextually. They can work, they can answer text messages, but are incapable of assembling paragraphs and forming complex abstractions.

We're fucked on a level that is hard to convey.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

the highest turnout of registered voters and young voters in American history.

This is one of the problems with how we've pushed the messages like "rock the vote", that you should vote, no matter what, or you're being a bad citizen.

If you can't be bothered to actually try to be informed, then you shouldn't feel pressure to vote. Sure, you should be allowed to vote no matter what, but no one should be pressuring you to vote even with lack of interest.

We should be emphasizing you should get to know the candidates up and down the ballot, not just getting your mark on a ballot.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ghosthacked@lemmy.wtf 8 points 6 days ago

This is what dump wants. He's already mobilised his incels and provided ample firepower.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)
[–] SeriousMite@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

“Let them behold my beautiful new ballroom.”

load more comments
view more: next ›