this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2025
160 points (97.1% liked)

politics

26189 readers
2524 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The government shutdown, already the second-longest in history, with no end in sight, is quickly becoming a way for President Donald Trump to exercise new command over the government. 

It wasn’t always this way. In fact, it all started with an attempt to tighten Washington’s observance of federal law. 

The modern phenomena of the U.S. government closing down services began in 1980 with a series of legal opinions from Attorney General Benjamin Civiletti, who was serving under Democratic President Jimmy Carter. Civiletti reached into the Antideficiency Act of 1870 to argue that the law was “plain and unambiguous” in restricting the government from spending money once authority from Congress expires.

In this shutdown, however, the Republican president has used the funding lapse to punish Democrats, tried to lay off thousands of federal workers and seized on the vacuum left by Congress to reconfigure the federal budget for his priorities. 

“I can’t believe the Radical Left Democrats gave me this unprecedented opportunity,” Trump posted on his social media platform at the outset of the shutdown.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

The fact Trump and the GOP are trying so hard to convince us this is good for them should tell everyone everything they need to know.

Keep it shut down. Fuck it. ICE isn't getting paid.

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As if he wasn't going to do this anyway. It's just faster for him to do it without the uproar. If the media were doing their job calling out how batshit stupid he is, maybe it wouldn't have gotten to this point.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe forcing them to speed up will turn the temperature up too quickly, and make the frog jump out of the boiling water. I doubt it, though.

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

It's definitely a thought, though. I think they've been doing that lately. Moving too fast. Overplaying their hand. Being too overt in their power grabs. Rocking the boat more than they need to. A lot of pundits seem to think the urgency is because of Trump's quickly failing health. That does seem to track

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yep. They did nothing to vet him at all in 2015-2016, although any one of them in the media even paying the least bit of attention could have told America just what a shitstain Taco was.

They fell down on the job even further in 2021-2024, helping spread the BidenSoOld shit, along with, "Democrats are just sooo unpopular" stuff...yeah, and I guess constantly beating that drum isn't going to influence people to start believing it and acting accordingly. Not to mention how they'd treat almost anyone talking about Project 2025 or speaking frankly about Taco's J6 Day of Terror and parallel coup attempt as just being hysterical or whatever.

The corporate media is as much to blame for this as anyone.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago

They wanted to cut all the federal agencies, why would they care about a shutdown?

They’ll make everyone work without back pay until they get the attrition numbers they want.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was promised that this kind of thing couldn't happen in America

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

Maybe the USA isn't exceptional

[–] whiwake@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The shutdown won’t end ever. This is the plan.

when all the atc quit and rich people become fireworks in the sky since they are the only ones who can fly, the shutdown will quickly end.