this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
39 points (95.3% liked)

Videos

16922 readers
412 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed
  9. AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago
[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"neo will not be allowed to pick up something that is very sharp"

  1. not very useful for cleaning up my kitchen

  2. how does it know what is sharp and what isn't? lots of things can be accidentally or unexpectedly sharp

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Useless safety theater. The actuation force this thing must have if it can ambulate and manipulate things? A knife is the least of my worries. What if it grabs me and breaks my arm or kicks me and shatters my shin? This thing would be far more efficient than a human at beating you to death.

The grip strength alone!

[–] Linearity@piefed.zip 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It couldn’t crack a walnut in the video
While dangerous, yes, a maid can do the same thing
I’m not saying Neo is a good idea, there are just better points to make

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago

Because it can’t technically or because it is artificially limited by software and/or hardware that can fail?

The fact that it can stand itself up means the actuation strength for the legs/thighs/etc has to be somewhat significant, unless they’ve managed to make this thing 10lbs

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

This iteration, wait until people start wanting it to chop wood or do any kind of farm work.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm skeptical of it eventually being automated in a useful way, and if it's not, then this is just an expensive roundabout way to hire a personal assistant/caregiver.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’m not opposed to the technology per se, but I agree, it doesn’t seem practical in any way right now.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Unless people can have sex with it.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

How long before people try to get intimate with the operators of these things?

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Literally just slavery with extra steps.

The rich want slaves but they don't want to see or interact with them. Creepy CEO even made a point to show off how weak robot 1-X is, so the slaves better not get any ideas, either.

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago

The word robot literally cubes from the Czech meaning "forced labor", so this tracks.