this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
120 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

71998 readers
2933 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Boeing says it can’t make money with fixed-price contracts::"Rest assured we haven't signed any fixed-price development contracts, nor intend to."

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 86 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fuck you Boeing. You fuckers have stacked cash hand over fist for fucking decades milking the fucking government and the American people like goddamn cattle. The endless growth has to end. The endless greed has got to end.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

Flying Blind is a spectacular book, as much about the financial engineering that doomed GM and Boeing and many others took as their compass;, the safety and quality just the inevitable cost of cutting corners.

https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/646497/flying-blind-by-peter-robison/

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 57 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Jeez, if you can't make money off of defense industry contracts, you should probably just hang it up.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

They can, they just use cost-plus contracts so they make money no matter how far off schedule or budget they end up.

[–] lps2@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Doing work with government, I understand why - ten billion different stakeholders to wrangle, strained budgets (probably not as big of an issue in defense but rampant throughout the rest of gov't), lawmakers changing things mid-project that have a material effect on how the project is carried out, and endless redtape throughout the process. I don't propose FF for gov projects either because inevitably they violate our assumptions by not getting their shit in order which kills the timeline, adds a ton of overhead, and results in a change order anyway which then just starts the whole process of approvals all over again.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I was under the impression that those sweetheart deals were getting hard to come by, but I don't work bids.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

There's still a few out there. Take Clear for example, the subscription line skipping service that works alongside TSA.

Somebody's palms got heavily greased to allow this company to thrive in the airport security space.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Admittedly, it was quite a while ago that I had anything to do with government contracting, so you could be right.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 2 years ago (3 children)

So either you suck at forecasting your own production, or you suck at production enough to not hit your forecast? And you want other people to pay you more because you don't have a good handle on your buisness?

[–] krayj@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't think they suck at forecasting...I think they are probably exceptional at forecasting but willfully lie about project costs when submitting bids for projects in order to come under the competition and win the contract. There doesn't seem to be any penalties for this, so why would they stop?

That happens all the time. I went through several government contracts where a company would come and under bid the current contract by a significant amount, win the bid, offer the current contractors 3/4 of what they were being paid and fill in the rest with new hires. There is no continuity between contracts so unless a bunch of the old contractors took a pay cut to stay on they would come in and start from scratch with all new processes and procedures and absolutely slow down productivity for all those they were supposed to be providing support.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago

If they're anything like other DOD contractors they make empty promises and straight up lies to get bids on contracts that they can't deliver on time on. They know they will fail these timelines but it makes them look good for that quarter so it doesn't matter to them.

[–] jimbolauski@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

The forecasts for FFP projects have competitive forces pushing them down. Many times they will underbid to win than hope everything goes perfect or they can find a way to weasel out of it.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh, very good Worf. Eat any good books lately?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I recently consumed a copy of Martok's Enchiridion of Klingon Fashion. It was tasteful.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It sounds like Boeing is shit at forecasting. Maybe hire better analysts.

[–] w2qw@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago

That's the point

[–] silencioso@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Zombies? In my capitalism?

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Boeing released its third-quarter results on Wednesday, and there were promising numbers showing increasing revenues and narrowing losses as the multinational corporation continues its economic recovery.

This division, which includes missile production for the military and space activities such as satellites and the Starliner spacecraft, lost $1.7 billion during the first three quarters of this year.

Notably, the pair pinned the blame for performance by its defense and space division, referred to internally as BDS, on fixed-price contracts.

Boeing has been developing Starliner for more than a decade and is running six years behind its original goal of flying crew to the International Space Station for NASA in 2017.

As it has sought to compete with SpaceX on a purely fixed-price contract for crew transport, Boeing has reported more than $1 billion in losses to date and still has yet to fly its first astronaut mission.

After an issue was discovered with the soft links in Starliner's parachute design this summer, Boeing has had to work with Airborne to strengthen the main canopy suspension lines.


The original article contains 662 words, the summary contains 175 words. Saved 74%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

I bet there are some other airplane makers that can.