this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
1 points (60.0% liked)

science

20312 readers
894 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ViridianNott@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

This is just true by definition of the word “ancestor”

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Not precisely humans but the ancient placental mammal lineage that includes humans, dogs, and bats.

Obviously. That’s how evolution works. Everything alive today had an “ancestor” alive at the time of the dinosaurs, and before the time of the dinosaurs.

[–] TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I guess the Flintstones predicted this one...

[–] Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

I feel like the news is in the details here, that non-biologists won't really understand or appreciate. Because as far as I know it's not news that small mammals co-existed with dinosaurs.

I distinctly remember learning (as a kid) that mammals survived it because they were small, could breed often, and produced lots of offspring... so they could evolutionally adapt quickly.

[–] hungryish@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

How would we exist if they didn't?

[–] Rusticus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If humans came from apes why are there still apes?

/s

[–] TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If dogs come from wolves, why are there still wolves? Some things change during their lifecycles (like caterpillars to butterflies or tadpoles to frogs). Other things change between generations. Not everything in a classification has to change.

[–] Rusticus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did you miss the /s that I entered or did you forget your own?

[–] TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I swear it didn't have a /s when I read it. Sorry.