this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
1359 points (98.2% liked)

Memes

47169 readers
1418 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 78 points 1 year ago

... because multiplication is commutative.

[–] saltnotsugar@lemm.ee 68 points 1 year ago (1 children)

69% of 420 is equal to 420% of 69.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, is 289.8 the magic, double "nice" number?

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] EvolvedTurtle@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

Bro that's actually amazing

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (3 children)

33% of 7 = 7% of 33

Bitch, this only works for certain easy maths.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

29% of 29 is 29% of 29

Fuck, this trick sucks.

[–] n0m4n@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Which equals 29^2 x .01 => ((28 x 30) +1) X .01
=> (840 + 1) x .01 => 8.41

28 x 30 is an easy mental calculation, as is adding 1, as is moving the decimal place over 2 places. I am teaching this to 4th graders, in two weeks. % to decimal is next week. They can square 2-digit numbers in their heads, already.

[–] Finite@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

((30 x 30)-30-29) x .01, easy

[–] Girru00@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

33% is the easy one.... 1/3 of 6 is 2, 1/3 of 1 is 0.33... 2.33..

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

1% of 33 is .33

.33 × 7 =

.3 x 7 = 2.1

.03 x 7 = .21

21 + 2.1 = 2.31

So

7% of 33 = 2.31

You could also do

33% of 7

10% of 7 is .7

1% of 7 is .07

So 11% is .77

.77 × 3 =

.7 × 3 = 2.1

.07 × 3 = .21

2.1 + .21 = 2.31

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's pretty damned intensive for a trick that's supposed to make the maths easier.

[–] plague_sapiens@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Who said math will be ever easy?

[–] TAYRN@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (7 children)

....I mean, yeah? If the number is 50 or 10 that works out great. But let's try that with 7% of 13. Now it's 13% of 7. Just like you said, "much easier to calculate."

Okay, choosing prime numbers was intentionally mean on my part. But 3% of 9 becomes 9% of 3. 4% of 2 becomes 2% of 4. Can anyone honestly look me in the eye and tell me that this tip has helped them out in any meaningful way?

[–] Ravi@feddit.de 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

x% × y = x × y ÷ 100 This helps you out much more.

[–] plague_sapiens@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Its easier:

10% of a 100: 100 * 0,1 = 10

2,5% of 33: 33 * 0,025 = 30 * 0,025 + 3 * 0,025 = 0,75 + 0,075 = 0,825

Thats how I calculate it mostly in my brain. But being smart I usually just type everything (like 9*9) in the calculator xD

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, single digit percentages are easy. If it helps, move your decimal to the right so 9% becomes 90%. You can probably calculate 90% of 3 because you can do 10% and subtract it and get 2.7. Now move your decimal back to the left and you get 9% of 3 which is 0.27. You can do the same with higher percentages once you learn to break them in to 10% pieces.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're really asking whether commutativity of multiplication has ever helped anyone? Because that's what this is.

And yes it has helped me eg. estimate things or whatever along the years – but of course it's not going to be some sort of magical mathematics trick where just by reversing the numbers it'll always make things easier to calculate in your head

[–] TAYRN@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, I think we all learned that multiplication is commutative in late elementary school, and obviously that's an important thing to know.

But I think the original post tried to make it out to be some magical mathematical trick, and I really don't understand that. Maybe I misunderstood the post.

Edit: wow, "commutative" is a really hard word to spell.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I think this is more about how you interpreted it, because it doesn't look like others took it as being an absolute magic trick rule and neither did I.

The Panzer of the Lake didn't use the word "commutativity" (fuck that really is hard to spell), but it gave out some wisdom that applied that rule by saying that "percentages are reversible": if the reverse of a percentage would be easier to calculate, you can use it and get the same answer. If it's not easier, well, then you're screwed 😁 Oooooor depending on the situation you can use the a × b% = a × b / 100 commutativity trick:

7 × 8% = 0.56

7 × 8 / 100 = 0.56

[–] TAYRN@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, that is actually much more helpful. So, if you know your times tables, you can do percentages. You just have to use communitavatization.

Jokes aside, I really appreciate it. That made it much more easier to understand. Thank you.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're welcome! Glad I could give you an a-ha moment.

Having an intuitive feel for tricks like using the definition of operators or symbols to make your life (well, calculations at least) easier usually means that you either have to just be "naturally" talented at math which is really rare, or you've just had to grind grind grind math at eg. university, work or whatever. So unless someone was taught that above trick and they actually remember it from school, they might never come to think that "hmm % just means / 100 so that can make this easier to figure out in my head".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 15 points 1 year ago

I'd find 9% of 3 easier for sure. Sometimes it's easier sometimes it's not. Just use it when it's easier.

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

Wait are you questioning the wisdom of panzer of the lake?!

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Moops@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So you might even say, "21% of you helped the tip"?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. 100% of 21%

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Feddinat0r@feddit.de 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read that now not for the first Time

I still dont believe it

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You can work it out yourself. 6% is the same as 6/100, so 6% of 50 is (6/100)*50. Then do some algebra and see if you can jiggle it to say (50/100)*6. Then replace 6 and 50 with Greek letters so it looks more convincing.

[–] aksdb@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

Nah, I prefer to treat my math problems like climate change. With denial.

[–] Saber_is_dead@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

jiggle it

aljigglebra

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DharkStare@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could also do 6*50 and then divide by 100.

[–] remotedev@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] DharkStare@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In the meme example you wouldn't, but if you were trying to figure out Something like 2% of 5, it's easier to do (2 * 5)/100=0.1 then to do .02 * 5 or .05 * 2.

My comment was mainly pointing out that you can multiply those numbers in whatever order you want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Thanks Panzer

[–] Teriyakiboy98@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MochiEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Teriyakiboy98@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Right back at you! :)

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Also, a surprising number of people don't know that precentages are more often than not represented as decimals between 0 and 1 as opposed to actually a number out of 100 when used in calculations (because the concept of a percent doesn't really exist in math, it's just a context specific way of formatting a decimal). A lot of people just enter 69 when calculating a formula that operates on a precentage instead of 0.69 which obviously makes the formula useless, or if a formula is supposed to output a precentage, they assume that it output 0.69 percent instead of 69 percent.

[–] drew_belloc@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Same energy as multiplication with 9, just take 1 from the right side and put it on the left

(09, 18, 27, 36, 45)

[–] bobzilla@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Instructions unclear...

09, 108, 1107, 11106, 111105

[–] drew_belloc@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Keep doing this until you get a binary number and then your pc can do the rest for you

[–] gusVLZ@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Found the JavaScript developer

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You can multiply by 9 on your fingers.

Hold hands out, fingers splayed, thumbs towards each other. 🙌

9*2 put your left ring finger down (the 2nd finger). Left of that is tens place, right of that is the ones place.

So 1 on the left, 8 on the right of the downed finger.

9*5 put the left thumb down (5th finger.) 4, 5. 45.

[–] RobertOwnageJunior@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Instructions unclear, thumb stuck in asshole.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

That's numberwang

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I thought with "reversible" they meant that a number falling 50% and then rising 50% afterwards, it is the same number, which is not true.

10 * 50% = 5

5 * 150% = 7.5

[–] RippleEffect@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

50% of 10 is 5

10% of 50 is 5

Not sure if you're saying you got it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›