this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
151 points (94.7% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

10501 readers
37 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Piped alternative

Davos elites seem nostalgic for a time when "they were the gatekeepers and owned the facts". Imagine being held to a higher journalistic standard!

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Social media has both destroyed and freed society

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just destroyed from what I see.

[–] CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Definitely only destroyed. While journalistic integrity has always been something fragile and often lacking, the shift of news media to try to capture the social media audience while simultaneously trying to “compete” with the content aggregators has led to much more vapid and misleading reporting.

24 hour cable news was the death knell for news media, and social media has been the final nail in the coffin. It accelerated the decline in journalistic standards to a ridiculous degree.

[–] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

To give them benefit of the doubt, maybe they meant that they were trusted to be factual. "We owned the news" could mean most people thought "I trust the WSJ so if they say so it must be true". But now in the age of misinformation, no one can be trusted.

But all this was said at Davos, the literal comic con for billionaire assholes. Its more likely they were talking about a news monopoly, facts be damned.

Dammit! I wish there were a news owner who could tell me what to think! /s

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I mean, they lost all credibility the second Rupert bought them. The willingness to sell cast doubt on their credibility prior to the sale.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, I gave her the benefit of the doubt as well, but framing it as "we were the gatekeepers" and seeming annoyed that they have to be more transparent about their process is an... interesting way of presenting the argument.

I didn't find the full context for the video, but I don't think she was talking about the problem of misinformation. Even if they have credible sources that 99% of experts agree on and a transparent process, misinformation will still be spread (see climate change denial). So I think that's a different problem entirely.

[–] muse@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

For just a dollar a week, you too can support neglected billionaires unable to keep their stranglehold on the narrative

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You mean pushing lies and propaganda for israel that were debunked in a few days made them lose credibilty? Crazy.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Only Rupert controls their narrative.