this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

News

30754 readers
2277 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Singapore conducted its first execution of a woman in 19 years on Friday and its second hanging this week for drug trafficking despite calls for the city-state to cease capital punishment for drug-related crimes.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] baascus@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Singapore hanging its weight on an antiquated, inhumane justice system while the world evolves towards rehabilitative models is downright disturbing. Death penalties for drug offenses are an archaic, blunt instrument to tackle a complex issue, punishing the vulnerable pawns rather than the kingpins of the trade.

[–] Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Nobody is forcing you to sell drugs in Singapore...

[–] baascus@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No one is forcing Singapore to execute those who the rest of the world views at petty criminals.

We’re not talking about drug kingpins here.

[–] Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

So? Singapore doesn't want any drugs in the country, and put up draconian laws. Just don't break those laws.

If I tell you that I will brutally murder you if you come to my house wearing a red tie, and you do that... Your death is at least partly on you. Because you had absolutely no good reason to do that.

There is absolutely no positive outcome to selling or consuming heroin. Just don't do it. It's not a hard rule to follow...

[–] baascus@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

All I take from what you're saying is that it is easy for you to morally justify murdering someone that you don't know, much less harmed you.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

That's because that's literally exactly what this commenter is stating, and nothing else. They leave a reasonable person no choice but to judge them as bloodthirsty and heartless

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

I think you're lost. Fascists aren't really too welcome on Lemmy to my knowledge.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

Nobody is forcing you to lack empathy and common sense.

[–] jungekatz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

31 grams , are they serious ? Are there no other crimes in singapore now ?

[–] barnsbauer@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

31 grams of pure heroin. I think it's worth mentioning.

While Singapore has doled severe punishments for possession of paltry amounts of cannabis in the past, the drug in this particular case is incomparable to weed.

[–] wahming@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Biased title. Why should gender matter in law? This is a blatant attempt to tug at emotions. And they try to focus on '31 grams' instead of 'a year's supply'. Take that clickbait back to reddit.

Edit since a lot of people think I'm discussing the sentencing. I'm not, I'm discussing the article itself. My reasoning:

Why I find the headline objectionable:

  1. Emphasis on gender. Why does it matter that she's female, or how long is it's been since the last woman was executed? Is it any more or less significant / objectionable than a man being sentenced to the same thing? It's not trying to make some sort of analysis about gender trends, so I can only assume it's a device to invoke emotions.
  2. Choice of wording about the quantity. 'A year's supply' would have made it very obvious to anybody browsing that this was not a casual user. Instead they went with the less accessible amount in grams, which makes it seem to those unfamiliar with drugs like it was a tiny bust.

Combined, the headline seems to be pushing a specific agenda, which I find deplorable (the covertness, not the agenda).

[–] Ktheone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Are you an incel by any means? Because clearly if its a women, the title will obviously be that. If it was a man, it wouldve been that. Keep your incelish shit somewhere else man.

[–] wahming@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago

It's incelish to point out a headline is exploiting gender politics for clicks? Ok.

I'm not sure you know what an incel is, BTW. Here's the definition for your reference: "a member of an online community of young men who consider themselves unable to attract women sexually, typically associated with views that are hostile towards women and men who are sexually active."

Now tell me which part of my statement is hostile towards women, or in any way at all related to sexuality. You're merely using the term as a hammer against viewpoints you disagree with.

[–] HeavenAndHell@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

IDGAF if it was 3 years, the punishment is still extreme for the crime. You can go back to reddit

[–] wahming@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago
[–] FReddit@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How did they execute the woman?

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"Singapore hangs first woman in 19 years"

I think they shot her.

[–] drbluefall@toast.ooo 1 points 2 years ago

Nah, I'm pretty sure they used a lethal injection.

[–] FReddit@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social -3 points 2 years ago

Barbarians.