As creative as humans are, we still build off prior people's skills and knowledge. I can see AI becoming the primary source of entertainment media in the future, uncomfortably enough.

[–] Nythos@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I, for one, welcome our SkyNet overlords

[–] agreyworld@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, I think people are naive about how much humans base their creative work of things they have read/experienced when saying generative AI just copies what came before it. So is almost everything humans create.

A lot of entertainment is very derivative. Honestly, I wonder what kind of stuff will start happening in creative circles when generative AI content becomes ubiquitous.

Look at photography and how it affected the art world (arguably). Once perfectly reproducing images became possible art started exploring so much more than the technical aspect of how things looked. Impressionism, cubism, modernism, post modernism.

Being able to make a picture look like the subject lost almost all value, and art moved onto more abstract endeavours.

What will happen to writing when a "normal" book can be written in a day? What will happen to music when a celebrity singer can just be put into any song with the click of a button?

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Honestly, a lot of the scripts in recent media has been absolute drivel anyway... Certainly the basic Netflix and marvel rubbish could be generated and tweaked quite easily

[–] 1bluepixel@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

AI here just means they're using AI modeling to isolate Lennon's vocal track from an old demo. I'd be more offended if they autotuned him.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

How does Ringo feel about this?

[–] mr_jp@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It seems that they're only using a.i to separate vocals from an existing demo track that already has Lennon's vocals.