this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024

174 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22347 readers

71 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

174

Australian prime minister labels Elon Musk ‘an arrogant billionaire who thinks he is above the law’ (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by tardigrada@beehaw.org to c/news@beehaw.org

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Cross posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/13351707

Australia’s prime minister has labelled X’s owner, Elon Musk, an “arrogant billionaire who thinks he is above the law” as the rift deepens between Australia and the tech platform over the removal of videos of a violent stabbing in a Sydney church.

On Monday evening in an urgent last-minute federal court hearing, the court ordered a two-day injunction against X to hide posts globally containing the footage of the alleged stabbing of Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel on 15 April. The eSafety commissioner had previously directed X to remove the posts, but X had only blocked them from access in Australia pending a legal challenge.

Anthony Albanese on Tuesday said Musk was “a bloke who’s chosen ego and showing violence over common sense”.

“Australians will shake their head when they think that this billionaire is prepared to go to court fighting for the right to sow division and to show violent videos,” he told Sky News. “He is in social media, but he has a social responsibility in order to have that social licence.”

“What the eSafety commissioner is doing is doing her job to protect the interests of Australians. And the idea that someone would go to court for the right to put up violent content on a platform shows how out of touch Mr Musk is,” he said.

top 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 17 points 1 year ago

X (twitter) is a signatory to the Christchurch Call set-up by Jacinta Adern. Signatories agree among other things to suppress the dissemination of terrorism. Nobody is talking about this.

Signatories: https://www.christchurchcall.com/our-community

I checked the Christchurch Call website which clearly shows Xitter as a member of the community that agreed to:

"Take transparent, specific measures seeking to prevent the upload of terrorist and violent extremist content and to prevent its dissemination on social media and similar content-sharing services, including its immediate and permanent removal, without prejudice to law enforcement and user appeals requirements, in a manner consistent with human rights and fundamental freedoms. Cooperative measures to achieve these outcomes may include technology development, the expansion and use of shared databases of hashes and URLs, and effective notice and takedown procedures."

Full text: https://www.christchurchcall.com/about/christchurch-call-text

[–] MayonnaiseArch@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a bunch of people here trying to suck some Elon dick. Interesting

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Which comments? I read all of them, and saying, "he's an asshole who happens to be right about this" hardly seems like "sucking his dick".

This is a massive overreach by Australia. Countries should not be trying to mandate what content is acceptable for other countries. Even their argument about VPNs meaning that geoblocking won't work is a terrible argument, because they're basically arguing that X is responsible for stopping Australians from breaking Australian law.

Buying the idea that their citizens might circumvent security controls in order to access content they don't allow, so that content cannot be allowed anywhere else, would be like saying it makes sense to ban mature video games globally because kids will find ways to play them otherwise (and I bring that up because Australia is notorious for banning video games with similar arguments, and didn't allow mature games until 2013).

If China was telling social media sites to delete content that it doesn't like, outside of China, we'd all be telling them to fuck off.

Lastly, and very important to note, the Bishop whose stabbing this is all about has said he thinks the video should not be censored.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 7 points 1 year ago

Isn't that the label everyone uses?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

Just this once, I agree with the rich shithead. I think the videos are in poor taste, but no one country should be able to dictate what the rest of the world can access. Gdi. I need a shower.

[–] purple_cloud@mastodon.social 2 points 1 year ago

@tardigrada … just stating the obvious

[–] tesseract@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate it when I agree with an autocrat.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hitler liked dogs and said we shoukd be kind to them.

[–] tesseract@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks! That helps.