this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
177 points (91.5% liked)

AssholeDesign

9063 readers
1 users here now

This is a community for designs specifically crafted to make the experience worse for the user. This can be due to greed, apathy, laziness or just downright scumbaggery.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is no shade against uncle dane or jontohil2, this is probably just youtube's fault

here's what shows up if I click on the video

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 50 points 1 year ago

So, this sounds like an advertisement. Shouldn’t we require these to be labeled advertisements?

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Youtube will also put videos in your feed that you can't watch because they don't exist yet. And you can't hide the nonexistent video because doing so will hide the video when it eventually does exist.

If you think things couldn't possibly get any worse, you clearly don't work for google.

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Don't some creators exploit that because views count differently on premieres

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago

God I hate that.

You go to click on it and it just says "coming soon!", but when it does come out, it is already buried in my subscriptions so I forget it was released.

Missed plenty of Death Battles because of this

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean the notifications of live streams?

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

They notify normal videos sometimes.

[–] ReallyKinda@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My brother said Apple News does this too— you have the optional ability to subscribe to newspapers using it, but the subscription only content shows up in your feed even if you don’t subscribe. They have an option to block particular publications from your feed as well so he tried that to omit the articles he couldn’t access, but instead of actually removing them it leaves a blank square in that space in your feed saying that you’ve blocked the content. IDK what they’re thinking.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're hoping they can annoy people into subscribing.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And yet all they did was annoy people into leaving. The only ones left are those that think they can't live without a platform.

[–] amio@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Source? Would love to believe it, but... I don't.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Source is common sense. People either get annoyed enough to leave, or are dumb and stay. Well, third option - like with YouTube - is to circumvent their bullshit somehow. But that's not possible with every platform.

[–] amio@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pro tip: whenever someone asks you if you have a source and you say either "common sense" or "go find out", you have just said "no I don't."

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Why would this need a source? Is this scientific material or some shit? Do I have to include source of what I write every time?

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Same unfortunate story with Google News, lots of articles that I cant actually read. On Facebook I filter out URLs that paywall their articles so the stories are hidden, but I don't use Facebook more than once a month or so and nearly every chum bucket news aggregator out there does this.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

very hush hush, but there's this app called New Pipe, available through F-droid

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

NewPipe seems to be unmaintained now, use the fork Tubular instead.

[–] UprisingVoltage@feddit.it 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Newpipe is in active development and just updated a few days ago, they just have a slow release schedule.

I use tubular and it's great, but Tubular itself is still subject to newpipe's release cycle.

Not sure why people started thinking newpipe is unmantained, this is the second time I hear it here on Lemmy

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Not sure why people started thinking newpipe is unmantained, this is the second time I hear it here on Lemmy

Because it has been unable to load comments and constantly shown errors for several months now.

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Google copied the ability to download multiple apps at the same time from F-droid. They're scared.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Copied what? The ability to multidoulwnload? Like what's been in Chrome for... forever? Of Firefox.. Or Internet Explorer.....Or BitTorrent?

Don't get all high and mighty acting like F-droid invented the concept.

[–] UprisingVoltage@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Play store is preinstalled on billions of devices, F-Droid is only used by a bunch of (very based) nerds.

Google is most definitely not scared of F-Droid

[–] amio@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

The videos being paid is not YT's choice, the channel owner must've set that specifically on those ranks for those videos.

Being visible despite being unavailable, seen 4149743 times before, plain crap, obvious junk with 45 views on a 2 sub channel, already specifically hidden, already specifically blocked, etc. etc etc etc etc... those are definitely Youtube though.

BlockTube may have a feature for this, it addresses some of those other cases. Or you could potentially hack together a uBlock rule for it ("any video on the front page that has this stupid price tag thing")

[–] Lolman228@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

It's working perfectly fine for me, and I haven't paid youtube a cent

[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I mean…. By now I really don’t think anyone can genuinely be surprised by anything because it’s clear Google and other companies like them (dominating cyberspace related) are just constantly trying to become more and more insidious.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

uh this might get me hate but this is a rare instance of youtube doing its job and doing it well.

members videos are basically like patreon but directly on youtube. members who choose to fund a channel get ad-free and exclusive content on top of the knowledge their money/attention is going directly towards their favorite creator and not some random advertiser.

and youtube is doing its job by advertising this content. it would be a failure of a service if it kept these videos a secret.

“but it’s annoying”

it says “members only” right there. just don’t click it and learn to accept that the creators you enjoy need to make a living somehow.

[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

YT members is such a sucky program. 30% of the money goes to Google, which is ridiculous. Only 8% goes to Patreon.

[–] quenpwn@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Alto@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Its basically patreon built into youtube

[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except YouTube takes a 4x cut compared to Patreon lol

[–] Alto@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Never said it was good

[–] quenpwn@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Only a matter of time until OF type content

[–] InfiniWheel@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Thats an enourmous leap in logic my man, what

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I wish. That's not gonna happen.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 year ago

that sounds like an interesting conversation, really