this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
978 points (100.0% liked)

196

17534 readers
592 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BobbyNevada@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 months ago

There can be only one!

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 months ago

Based anime set theorist.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (11 children)

a consequence of the axiom of choice is that every set can be given a well ordering. and well orderings always have smallest elements, but they may not have largest elements.

so there is someone who is the least gay, but there may not be a single person who is the most gay.

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The axiom of choice doesn't say one way or another whether the spectrum in "the standard order" (is there a standard definition of more/less gay?) is a well ordering, only that there is some well ordering.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›