this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
602 points (98.4% liked)

News

26617 readers
3492 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Russia's first moon mission in 47 years failed when its Luna-25 space craft spun out of control and crashed into the moon after a problem preparing for pre-landing orbit, underscoring the post-Soviet decline of a once mighty space programme.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhyYesZoidberg@lemmy.world 218 points 2 years ago (1 children)

did they mistake the moon for an ukrainian hospital or something?

[–] Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

WhyYesZoidberg

[–] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 84 points 2 years ago (3 children)

"The apparatus moved into an unpredictable orbit and ceased to exist as a result of a collision with the surface of the Moon," Roskosmos said in a statement.

It has ceased to exist, it is bereft of life! This is an ex-apparatus!

[–] Papergeist@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

He's just pinin' for the feeyords

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

So Boeing did the flight software?

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 57 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Russia isn't the Soviet Union, they clearly are unable to control the little technology they have left.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

i am kinda surprised their space program didnt fall apart sooner. foreign interest in said program somewhat helped maybe.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 42 points 2 years ago (1 children)

For a while the Soyuz spacecraft was the only way to get up to the ISS, so I'm sure NASA and ESA were helping them any way they could to keep those working.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And the Soyuz is barely upgraded 1960s technology. Amazing that NASA relied on it.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

They had to. The government killed the Shuttle without an immediate replacement.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Young scientists fled Russia because they would be forced to fight in Putin's stupid war.

[–] ScrollinMyDayAway@lemm.ee 56 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So the Special Lunar Operation didn't go as planned? I thought they said it would only take three days...

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It said a special inter-departmental commission had been formed to investigate the reasons behind the loss of the Luna-25 craft, whose mission had raised hopes in Moscow that Russia was returning to the big power moon race.

lol, lmao

[–] ACatNamedBunny@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago

Lmfao, roflmao

[–] kaitco@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Any news on how the Indian one did?

I expected Russia’s to blow up on launch, so bully for them for getting it to the moon, but India was scheduled to launch one yesterday too, and I’m far more intrigued about how they faired.

[–] halfwaythere@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Scheduled for Wednesday to land on the moon

[–] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 26 points 2 years ago

So the "let's give our people nothing and expect them to land on the moon" attitude doesn't work after all, how surprising!

[–] Sir_Premiumhengst@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Lol Russia rly became a laughing stock lately...

[–] NYPariah@reddthat.com 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] apfelcreme@feddit.de 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Good thing russia is such a wealthy country, im sure they couldnt have spent the money any better. This is all just propaganda for the home front, so russia can depict themselves larger as they are and distract their own people from the ongoing decline

[–] stigmata@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

A failed space program probably wouldn't be the smartest way to do that.

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Post-Soviet decline?

Their last attempt at a lander was in 1976 which is (checks notes) smack dab in the middle of the Soviet era ... and it crashed too.

[–] mayonaise_met@feddit.nl 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Did it fall out of a window?

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Someone is about to be defenestrated over this once they figure out who to pin it on.

[–] AttackPanda@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

I heard it was a smoking incident.

[–] funchords@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The result of about half of recent lander missions from Earth is failure.

The USA hasn't tried one recently.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_missions_to_the_Moon

[–] Donnywholovedbowling@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Yeah but the USA also completed a highly complex multi-stage landing on Mars without a crash so I think they could do the moon if they wanted to

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Been there, done that, got the conspiracy theorists.

Or we're just luring in the sphere earth sheeple from other countries' space programs so they waste resources smashing their rockets and landers into the firmament.

[–] Nythos@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

sphere earth

Are you trying to say that the is earth is flat

Only if you take my comment at face value.

[–] spamfajitas@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The impact site should be given a suitable name to remember this event. Fascist's Folly? Dictator's Demise?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

Glory to Ukraine.

'putin's promise'. his name deserves to be aligned with a crater of failure comprised of the literal remains of the soviet union's space program.

[–] TheHottub@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

This sparks joy.

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

That was one very small step for mankind.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago
[–] jukey@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago
[–] JustZ@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

This is my happy thought.