this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
336 points (98.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

36747 readers
373 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

^.?$|^(..+?)\1+$

Matches strings of any character repeated a non-prime number of times

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vbk0TwkokM

(page 2) 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Is there a reason to use (..+?) instead of (.+) ?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Empty input Or input of exactly 1 character Or input of at least 2 characters, followed by at least 1 something (idk what \1 matches)

Did I get it (almost)?

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

\1 is group 1 which is inside (), so second part is repeated 2 or more times of 2 or more char.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

Interesting.

So that means match any string that is made entirely of a single repeating sequence, where repititon is possible.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago

The pipe is throwing me off because usually I have to do parentheses for that to work...

[–] ShaunaTheDead@fedia.io 2 points 7 months ago

It matches for non-primes and doesn't match for primes.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm I the only one who pronounces regex with a soft g? Hard g feels so clunky

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

All my homies hate regexs. That's actually the best use case I found for LLMs so far : I just tell it what I want it to match or not match, and it usually spits out a decent one

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 3 points 7 months ago

That sounds…

Easier to get almost right than actually learning the subject.

Much, much harder to get completely right than actually learning the subject.

So yes, basically the archetypal use case for LLMs.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›