this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
42 points (100.0% liked)

Reddit

13820 readers
2 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fessord@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"We're open but we're not going to approve anything"

[–] DoucheAsaurus@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

Quiet modding

[–] Fabriek@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Good news for scammers

[–] narwhal@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Damn, /u/spez is scamming all reddit moderators to work for free.

[–] Jon-H558@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Literally.always been the way.

Interestingly in some jurisdictions this may be illegal. I am United Kingdom. A friend worked at a medium size music festival (not Glastonbury but not just someone's backyard). For a long time the deal.wqs.just a free ticket and food tickets for 8hrs work a day for the 3featival days and a day either side setup and takedown. As the festival made more profit for the owners the tax man got interested and found the ticket and food was less than minimum wage and started that the benefit of getting to see the whole thing and be communtity" was just the ticket price no matter what the "volunteers" said.

[–] verysoft@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is the best malicious compliance so far, still reddit could 'force' them to remove the approval restriction.

But subreddits like pics doing the john oliver thing are completely missing the point, reddit dont care if they do that, it's still getting thousands of views and upvotes because its 'cool and funny', its such a 'we did it reddit' moment. Just stop using reddit, let the subreddits go to shit with no moderation, make a sticky linking to alternatives.

[–] curiosityLynx@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The point of the John Oliver pictures is to make it hard for him to NOT at least spend a segment of his next show talking about it.

[–] verysoft@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think it will have the opposite effect people want. It will drive traffic to reddit to see the funny pics, it wont suddenly stop the masses using reddit, a garbage experience has to occur for that.

[–] techno156@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But it will get them talking, which is the main point of it. Regular people will wonder why the sub is full of John Oliver, letting them find out about the API changed and everything.

[–] pancakes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

It's also a way to get people to see what is actually happening from a more unbiased source. Since spez did a whole interview circuit, that might be all some people know about the situation.

[–] 1984@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] LittleKerr@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Talk about not pulling your punches! Haha! 👏

[–] gkd@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is the way. Reddit cannot expect people to dedicate the same amount of time in volunteer work if they don’t enjoy the platform.

[–] sijt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I think it's a bit more than enjoyment. People felt a sense of ownership in the communities they helped build. And whilst they were always contributing to Reddit inc they still felt some control. Now that Spez has gone full on world's dumbest capitalist and keeps yelling about companies having to pay for "his" data, data which he didn't pay for himself, it's really exposed what's always been true. That Reddit is just another company, it's not your friend, it's not a community.

[–] resketreke@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

r/piracy, r/scams... They're forcing the best subreddits open!

[–] AmidFuror@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

r/scams was anti-scam, though.

[–] resketreke@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I know, it's just a joke

[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Should rebrand to allow scam guides only.

[–] moneygrowsontrees@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think this is the direction they should all take. Open but "quiet quit" and either do like /r/scams is doing with requiring approval but working on their own timetable, or let the subs devolve into unmoderated bot-a-thon mess.

[–] iSharted@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Why continue to mod it then? Let the place wreck itself with whatever nefarious modder shows up to do the dirty work.

[–] sisyphean@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

Maybe malicious compliance is more effective than a full strike.

[–] demonen@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's hard to just quit something you've nurtured for years.

[–] aeternum@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

I was never a mod, but i was an avid reddit user for close to 15 years. It was a sad day when I deleted my accounts, and it wasn't a decision i made lightly.

[–] covertskippy55@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

I think this is their way of not modding but not being replaced by other people who would mod as normal. Malicious complicance as @sisyphean said

[–] Blazze@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

That's basically what /interestingasfuck is doing. Anything goes within global rules.

[–] dan@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

If they don’t mod it the admins will take it away and install new bootlicker mods who’ll bend the knee, they’ve already said as much.

[–] SouthernCross@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

These guys are good. I love it!

[–] nevemsenki@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

14 days? Haha, that's good. Almost feels like a scam.

[–] Rhoeri@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And I was just banned from r/WatchPeopleDieInside for calling them out on bending over to Reddit admin.

[–] narwhal@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Did you feel like you die inside? Maybe you can post that to /r/WatchPeopleDieInside...oh wait...

[–] crossmr@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm not sure if I buy this. /r/videos was the first sub to go dark early and hasn't been brought back. If the admin were really going in and forcing subs to open you'd think they'd start with the sub that started everything and actually got coverage. Not some random subs.

[–] techno156@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

It could be the smaller subs for precisely that reason. /r/videos is high-profile, and is likely to kick a fit, so smaller subs would be a better testing ground, to see what the reception is, before steamrolling the others.