this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
333 points (99.4% liked)

hmmm

5127 readers
70 users here now

For things that are "hmmm".

Rule 1: All post titles except for meta posts should be just plain "hmmm" and nothing else, no emotes, no capitalisation, no extending it to "hmmmm" etc.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 55 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Forget the X-Y offsets. Spawned building on top of church.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I build shit like this in Fallout 4.

[–] Filibuster_Rhymes@lemm.ee 49 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This could have been a really cool reno with a better roof line and some vertical siding that tied in the butresses. Instead, it just looks cheap.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

maybe, there wasn't a roof to start with

[–] pixelscript@lemm.ee 47 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is this another one of those "by law, the addition has to look visibly distinct from the historical structure" renovations?

Same thing that allegedly happened to this one?

[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

Weird, that one went so far in the wrong direction it circled back around and I kinda like it.

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 45 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Before building work started I guarantee they promised "A tasteful renovation in keeping with the structure's historical aesthetic"🙄

[–] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

That was my comment haha

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

gmod object clipping noises

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Better than just demolishing the church, I guess, but they could have invested a little more into the materials and design and made it blend with the original facade better. Don't just build a square vinyl box.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago

I hate vinyl siding with a passion

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

there are many churches in Europe who were amputated or completely destroyed by American aerial bombings. Some were hastily rebuilt with cement and these hasty renovations after the WW2 have no architectural or historical value 🤷

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'm guessing this picture isn't of Europe. There's a stroad, as well as minivans and SUVs. I would guess this is North America. Probably the US, but that's just because I believe our neighbors to the north have a bit more class than this monstrosity indicates.

#FuckCars

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, please god noooooooooo

[–] Taniwha420@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

... it's hideous.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Modern architecture is like a corrupting virus

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago

I'm not an architecture buff, but I don't think that's what this is.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago

Seems to be in North America (license plate dimensions) so they probably did that to maximize the number of apartments while still keeping as much of the church as possible (without necessarily being required to as it is in the UK), would have looked better with another type of siding though...

[–] KittyCat@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Oh hey I've driven by that, yeah it's ugly as fuck. It's up in Lawrence Mass

[–] exothermic@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I’ve heard that leaving one wall up like this classifies a construction project as a renovation. I’m guessing this was done because it was cheaper or it’s in a historic district? Idk

[–] kubica@fedia.io 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If that's renovation anything can be called renovation.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

in old towns, unless the construction method itself has historical importance, they just keep the facade and build behind.

[–] CoCo_Goldstein@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I've heard the same. If a property is 'renovated', it retains the same value, tax wise, no matter how much larger the renovated building is.

Not sure how this plays out with a formerly tax exempt property like a church once it get converted into a non-tax exempt property such as a residential apartment building.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Wouldn't look so bad if they matched the color at least

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

that's exactly what's avoided in renovation. What's old and what's built afterwards should be clearly separate.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah if you're going with vinyl siding anyway just get the fake brick one

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 4 points 2 months ago

Anyone notice the house next door that’s almost touching the former church? There’s paint on the stone wall and the house”s windows. It’s like the painters didn’t mask anything.

[–] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

Bro we got the lowest prices around! I promise we are going to get you looking right. The restoration job your asking for we can deliver bro. Bro I got you. Your gonna save 60%. Property value is gonna go way up. Bro its all about calculating ROI. Algorithms and shit. 😂

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Could be worse... it could have one less floor.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

It looks like shit but it's better than letting all those bricks go to waste. I bet the insulation's pretty decent too.