this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
600 points (98.9% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

30174 readers
53 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world/

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations 💗

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skip0110@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Thankfully options like this are becoming available because it's really annoying to need to continually "digitally migrate" away as these corporate controlled websites become enshittified.

[–] jesus_fish@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

sweet summer child

[–] Machefi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

CEO-proof sounds pretty, though there already exists the (perhaps broader) term “decentralised”.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] anthoniix@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

One day the lemmy could just go closed source and sell to a company.

[–] Maiznieks@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Protocol is open, anyone can rewrite a federation client that pulls data off proprietary servers as a last resort. This is why federation is great. Besides, you can't close an open source project, you have to create new, closed parts to have them. That's how mariadb and galera took a chunk off mysql user base and how libreoffice became a successor of openoffice.

As a side note, I wish we could move accounts and even communities between instances, based on some kind of two way handshake agreement.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] llama@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No it isn't. A company can be formed to be the steward of either or both the Lemmy source code or popular instances, which would be run by a CEO. I bet anything these corporate structures naturally form as people try to monetize the community and seek investment to gain control over the ecosystem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lightingnerd@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

We do have a term for that, it's a little bit of a trigger-word for certain demographics, but the correct term is socialism.

[–] ronaldtemp1@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

From empirical evidence we learned that no way in socialism we can enjoy this kind of freedom of expression.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

You’re posting this on lemmy.world. The owner of this instance, the biggest new instance, is literally building out a business of instance hosting. If this goes well, and his business grows, it will have chief executives.

You could also totally monetize hosting and build a business around that. There are already several private projects to build lemmy clients.

With federated sites you won’t have one CEO. If it takes off, we’ll have many CEOs. Trust me.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

I've never thought of something being CEO-proof, but you're not wrong. Those CEO's did shit the bed in the most diarrhea way possible.

[–] nodsocket@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Not true. Email is basically owned by like five companies today. They just block every new host that tries to come up

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

What? No, I can make my own email server right now and send a message to your Gmail.

Or do you mean it would get sent to your spam folder?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›