this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
37 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38089 readers
385 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We analyzed every instance of AI use in elections collected by the WIRED AI Elections Project (source for our analysis), which tracked known uses of AI for creating political content during elections taking place in 2024 worldwide. In each case, we identified what AI was used for and estimated the cost of creating similar content without AI.

We find that (1) half of AI use isn't deceptive, (2) deceptive content produced using AI is nevertheless cheap to replicate without AI, and (3) focusing on the demand for misinformation rather than the supply is a much more effective way to diagnose problems and identify interventions.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 15 points 1 month ago

I question the rigor of this reporting. I read the story, and it's a series of "on the other hand" setups that generally tells you you don't have a story on your hands.

Basically:

Is "AI" cheaper? Depends. Does it have wider reach? Depends. Is it more effective? ...

You see where this is going. Down that road lies conjecture and anecdote.