ALiteralCabbage

joined 11 months ago
[–] ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk 39 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

How's that going in the US?

[–] ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I suppose it's not solely for gaming which turns me off the deck option; it would also be serving as the entry point for some self hosted stuff I'm running on the clunky old unit that's still chugging along.

[–] ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So possibly a false economy then?

I guess the scale of the unit is appealing - even a micro HPX doesn't come close; but that's the trade off I suppose.

[–] ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

What's the benefit of that Vs this? I don't care for portability and I like the option to at least crack this open and expand a few bits (if I need to).

[–] ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk 3 points 3 weeks ago

How would you break it down?

PC Partpicker disagrees with you, especially at the reduced price on the Amazon micro option - making some assumptions on equivalence between the 'baked in' chips and proper GPU etc.

I'd assume that economies of scale play a part too.

But I'm willing to accept that I'm wrong!

[–] ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Are they cheaper, though?

GPU prices being what they are an equivalent full size card, and the same CPU aren't far off the full build cost of the micro unit I linked to, and that's before cases, power supplies and whatever.

I understand the service situation; but that's not worse than my laptop/integrated devices - and this still has some scope for replacing non-soldered parts, presumably.

 

So I've been looking at upgrading my PC and it looks like I can get a better "micro" pc than my current (ancient) desktop for significantly less money than a full blown gaming rig. An example of such a rig is this.

I don't have high gaming requirements - I play mostly old games, I think the newest games I play are from 5+ years ago.

What reasons are there for not buying one of these (over a comparable "proper" desktop)?

[–] ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk 2 points 3 weeks ago

Could be, but my rotation does include a decent number of tracks with sexually explicit lyrics or anti-government themes.

Go figure.

[–] ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Only some users though? Very strange setup. I've not been asked at all, but maybe my music choices out me as old as fuck?

[–] ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You're moving the goalposts.

You made two key points;

  1. That suffering can be beneficial and
  2. That denying someone the opportunity to experience something beneficial is immoral, somtomhave kids is moral positive.

My primary objections are

  1. That suffering is always bad (although we disagree on the definitions of suffering, somits likely to be a moot point)
  2. Having children on the basis of it being morally good presents a number of very upsetting and dangerous implications.

Gaza was an example of a point, and of my own views on suffering; that suffering is something you cannot escape and that you do not choose, not something that's difficult or temporarily painful you can choose to do which will ultimately produce some good. I'd posit that everyone experiences some form of suffering in their lives, to varying degrees, and the minimisation of this can only ever be a net positive.

Personally I don't want children for a number of reasons, but boiling it down to a moral reason is reductive, unhelpful, and can be dangerous.

[–] ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I'd put it to you that suffering, in the sense that we're discussing, would be something more than the pain of exercise - the people of Gaza are suffering, when I go into the 'pain cave' on a bike ride I'm enduring something for the benefit of it; I can stop, pause or relent if it becomes overbearing. It's type 2 fun. It's not suffering if you can opt out; challenge, and difficulty arent bad; suffering is.

It's interesting that your anti-theistic approach has led you to what I would see as a very religious adjacent approach to reproduction; my worry with approaches like the outline you gave is that it can end up punishing any sort of reluctance to have kids (and can paint those who aren't able to as immoral in some way). Not saying that's you're intention, just saying.

[–] ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk 3 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Could an artist not suffer for their work that brings great joy to themselves and others? Is that suffering not then worthy and good?

This is an awful take. Not suffering is always preferable to suffering.

If something is worthy and good then denying others the opportunity to exist and be worthy and good is itself immoral.

Does this mean that you have a moral imperative to have children because there are "worthy and good" things in the world? Is the logic "I can have children, there is good in the world, therefore it's immoral to deny a potential life the opportunity to experience life"?

I say this as someone who can, but won't, have children, and who grew up in an evangelical church - that's a bizarre logic that feels an awful lot like some fundamentalist Christian quiverfull shit.

[–] ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

Looks like you live somewhere with nice riding!

Thanks for sharing - ebikes really open up the world; I've tackled many more roads on ebikes than I'd dare on my "normal" bike. Is your Haibike using the smart system?

5
Shimano offer full compatibility lists for the current drivetrains. (flbfotaodyq4pjij3wowkcz33m0bkopa.lambda-url.ap-northeast-1.on.aws)
 

Today I went to the supermarket, and spotted a deal on cheap earbuds.

I've been 50/50 on them, but a £40 pair for £20 was good enough for me to take a punt.

Are they great? No. Are they good enough? Yeah, sure, why not. They play music they take calls, and they act like earplugs when it's noisy out. And they don't get tangled up. Plus, if I like using them I'll consider getting a pair which aren't objectively e-waste when these inevitably die.

 

Greetings fellow fediverse bike-wrenchers; I want to talk about the Zyklop Mini today.

I love it and it's the best tool I've ever bought, bar none. With the (optional) bit check it stows nicely in a trousers pocket, apron, or ride bag/jersey pocket. It makes tightening up almost every bolt on most bikes trivial even when they're tucked nicely in some bullshit aero location. It lives in my 'everynday' bag, and it sees use almost every day. On rides I've adjusted almost every contact point on my bike with it. It even manages to deal with my brifter bolts in their almost stripped state.

Bonus points because it's also a great fidget.

Is it cheap? No. Is it worthwhile? Yes, very. I used generic 1/4" bits and bought the bit check case on eBay for pennies to save myself some pain.

What are your well-worth-the-money/never-leave-home-without cool tools?

6
Cool Tool Tuesday (velo.outsideonline.com)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk to c/bikewrench@lemmy.world
 

Dave Rome's stuff is great anyway - but the Wheels MFG mat with bearing sizer is especially nice; it's a pretty affordable quality of life upgrade for a workshop. Certainly easier than a ruler or whatever shoddy calipers your boss has bought you...

 

So, as we begin another week: what are your little vices or guilty pleasures that help you get through the day?

a practice, behaviour, or habit generally considered morally wrong in the associated society. In more minor usage, vice can refer to a fault, a negative character trait, a defect, an infirmity, or a bad or unhealthy habit

 

I have an old notebook which I've been toying with a few smaller distros on (typically easy to install, liveCD types), and while I enjoy the tinkering aspects of this, I had a thought that I've been mulling.

In the past I've run distributions based on larger, better supported, systems (Ubuntu, Debian, Arch, etc.) and if or when they have folded, like crunchbang did, or PeppermintOS (however briefly), I just changed them out.

However, if I were to go back to peppermintOS, say, would it be feasible to 'convert' the system to the parent distribution? So, could I force peppermintOS to 'become' Debian, for example? Or is this overly simplistic? It's a level of engagement with my operating systems that I just haven't had!

view more: next ›