Allah

joined 1 week ago
[–] Allah@infosec.pub 0 points 3 days ago

that would require thinking, how dare you insult his beliefs

[–] Allah@infosec.pub 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"engaging in warfare" is subjective

[–] Allah@infosec.pub 0 points 1 week ago

i am confused, i mean isn't reducing civillian casualties good? Sounds like you’ve switched to my side

[–] Allah@infosec.pub 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i am saying germans were agressors in ww2 that's why it was bad

[–] Allah@infosec.pub 0 points 1 week ago

watch out islamic botnet will not like this comment

[–] Allah@infosec.pub -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

of course not because they were agressor in invading poland which had a goverment of it's own

[–] Allah@infosec.pub -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

wrong it was axis fault for militarizing it in the first place, by not bombing it they would have incentivized the practice

THE FAULT IS ON AXIS NOT ALLIES

[–] Allah@infosec.pub -4 points 1 week ago (9 children)

ok but who is to blame for their deaths? the allies or axis ?

[–] Allah@infosec.pub -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (21 children)

no one is saying it is right smart ass, i am just saying you should accuse the entity that militarizes civillian areas

[–] Allah@infosec.pub -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

collateral damage bad, but Germans using civilians as human shield also bad, so blame should be on germans not allies

[–] Allah@infosec.pub -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

there are gay nazis and gay republicans as well what's your point?

view more: next ›