AmbiguousProps

joined 2 years ago
[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 16 points 46 minutes ago

Just what the world needed, another nationalist nutjob.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Buy high, sell low 😎

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, makes sense from that perspective.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago

Well, sure, but that doesn't automatically mean the ATF has access to that.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

Yeah, I suppose my point is that it's very difficult to prove in court (especially the "regularly" part), and something would likely have to happen alongside the charge for it to be investigated in the first place. In other words, it seems like mostly theater, although it would be another tool to further charge any leftists that smoke pot in the future.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I guess, but "regularly" is hard to prove in court, or at least it was before 2025. Also before 2025, something would have to happen for you to be investigated for that in the first place. I'm sure now they'll just make up a reason to investigate pot smokers.

I do wonder how it would go over in court now. In a jury trial, the prosecution would likely still have to prove that you "regularly" smoke pot, right?

I suppose my point is that it probably won't be very effective in stopping pot smokers from owning guns (especially those that already own guns) if it's just a yes/no on a form.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 85 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (19 children)

They're just trying to find other ways to take guns from leftists and trans people.

Also, since pot is federally illegal, and legal states don't normally give the feds buyer info, how the hell would they even know? A form asking if you smoke pot? What stops someone from just saying they don't?

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It sounds like you really do fucking care about their opinion. It also sounds like you're projecting your own cowardice onto them.

The people out in the real world, attending these protests, especially in red states, are much more brave than you, and their actions are much more effective than anything you could possibly do or say here.

In your own words, "get fucked".

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 14 points 1 day ago

I picked unRAID to be able to mix disk sizes. It also requires little maintenance in my experience, so that's also a plus.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Flatpak works just fine, as it installs to the user directory and not any immutable part of the filesystem. Any non-flatpak apps can be ran in distrobox.

I love distrobox.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The immutability is the main difference. If something gets messed up, on boot you simply change to the previous image and you're back up and running again.

 

It used to be that 14TB was the sweet spot for recertified price per TB. After looking around, it seems like it's moved up a bit, at least on ServerPartDeals and goHardDrive, even 22 TBs are floating around $14/TB.

I feel like eventually I could migrate all of my 14TB disks to 22TB and save a lot of heat. Of course, I'd need to upgrade my two parity disks first, which would currently cost around $677 after tax. I'm curious as to what parity sizes everyone else is rocking.

I'm also kind of realizing that this probably doesn't need to be a post, but I'm gunna post it anyway in case someone wants to enable my data hoarding.

Edit: I forgot to mention that I'm strictly considering WD HC drives only.

 

Wildland fire veterans are seething at a claim made by federal officials that two crews raided by immigration agents at the scene of a wildfire in Washington state were “NOT firefighters.”

Many political figures and media outlets have repeated the claim, even though public documents show the crews have firefighting classifications and were assigned to key frontline roles battling the blaze.

“Everybody in the profession sees through it, but the public doesn’t and that’s concerning,” said Riva Duncan, a former wildland fire chief who served more than 30 years with the U.S. Forest Service. “It’s a lie. Everybody I’ve talked to is very upset about it. It does not just those two crews a disservice, but it does all firefighters a disservice.”

Duncan also serves as vice president of Grassroots Wildland Firefighters, a nonprofit that advocates on behalf of wildfire professionals.

Last week, federal immigration officials staged a raid at the site of the Bear Gulch fire in Washington, the largest active wildfire in the state. Agents with U.S. Customs and Border Protection questioned two crews, totaling 44 members, and arrested two firefighters who they said were in the country illegally.

But the facts clearly show that the crews were firefighters. In planning documents drafted by the management team overseeing the fire and posted to a public federal database, the crew from contracting company ASI Arden Solutions, Inc., is listed as a “CR2I” crew. That’s shorthand for a Type II Initial Attack wildland firefighting crew.

“They’re just one level below a hotshot crew,” Duncan said. “[Saying they’re not firefighters] is incredibly insulting to them.”

The other crew, from contracting company Table Rock Forestry, Inc., is listed as a “CRW2,” short for a Type II wildland firefighting hand crew. That means both crews were certified under National Wildfire Coordinating Group standards as firefighters who met rigorous qualifications and held “red cards” verifying their status to fight fire.

Additionally, the documents show that both crews were assigned to active firefighting roles in the days leading up to the raid. The crews were tasked with securing the fire edge, protecting structures, constructing fire lines and addressing hazards caused by the initial suppression work.

Many wildfire veterans who have served in similar roles privately expressed anger that the crew’s status was called into question because they had been assigned to cut firewood on the day of the raid. That frustration is heightened by the widespread belief, shared by many fire professionals, that the crews were given that assignment under false pretenses to lead them into contact with federal immigration agents.

“They were doing suppression work, and it was only when they were reassigned that day [that they were raided],” Duncan said. “To paint this picture that they would never do that to actual firefighters, it’s total spin.”

More in the article.

Archive link

 

Two people fighting the Bear Gulch fire on the Olympic Peninsula were arrested by federal law enforcement Wednesday, in a confrontation described by firefighters and depicted in photos and video.

Why the two firefighters were arrested is unclear. But a spokesperson for the Incident Management Team leading the firefighting response said the team was “aware of a Border Patrol operation on the fire,” that it was not interfering with the firefighting response and referred reporters to the Border Patrol station in Port Angeles.

Over three hours, federal agents demanded identification from the members of two private contractor crews. The crews were among the 400 people including firefighters deployed to fight the wildfire, the largest active blaze in Washington state.

It is unusual for federal border agents to make arrests during the fighting of an active fire, especially in a remote area.

While they were waiting for their division supervisor to arrive, federal law enforcement showed up around 9:30 a.m.

Federal law enforcement asked the crews to line up to check their IDs, according to the firefighters.

One of the firefighters said members of the crew were told not to take video of the incident.

“You risked your life out here to save the community,” the firefighter said. “This is how they treat us.”

More in the article.

Archive: https://archive.is/lcEnX

 

While it's fantastic that user tagging is an option, I think it's missing two important features:

  • Colored tags: this would help with categorizing users such as green meaning okay to interact with, and red for hostile users (for example).
  • Source links to comments/posts for the original tag. This would help with checking exactly why a user was tagged. The tag itself could link to the related comment or post.

Boost is by far the most user friendly Lemmy app I've used, so thanks!

46
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today to c/news@lemmy.world
 

The Mason County sheriff’s office ordered people near Olympic National Park to evacuate as the Bear Gulch fire grows.

The human-caused fire was first reported early this month near the park and has since grown to cover 2 square miles on the northern shores of Lake Cushman. It is less than 10% contained.

Anyone near the Dry Creek Trail, along the lake’s westernmost shores should evacuate immediately, the sheriff’s office said on social media. This is called a Level 3 evacuation order.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/ztkUn

Such a shame. The staircase area is (was) beautiful, and probably my favorite part of Olympic National Park. Tons of old growth rainforest is now gone, and the fire won't be out until it snows, according to officials.

Here's a link to the watchduty listing for the fire, has much more info: https://app.watchduty.org/i/54759

 

The Mason County sheriff’s office ordered people near Olympic National Park to evacuate as the Bear Gulch fire grows.

The human-caused fire was first reported early this month near the park and has since grown to cover 2 square miles on the northern shores of Lake Cushman. It is less than 10% contained.

Anyone near the Dry Creek Trail, along the lake’s westernmost shores should evacuate immediately, the sheriff’s office said on social media. This is called a Level 3 evacuation order.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/ztkUn

Such a shame. The staircase area is (was) beautiful, and probably my favorite part of Olympic National Park. Tons of old growth rainforest is now gone, and the fire won't be out until it snows, according to officials.

Here's a link to the watchduty listing for the fire, has much more info: https://app.watchduty.org/i/54759

 

With the recent first light milestone for the Vera Rubin Observatory, it's only a matter of time before one of astronomy's most long-awaited surveys begins. The Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) is set to start on November 5, and will scan the sky of billions of stars for at least ten years.

One of the most important things it aims to find is evidence (or lack thereof) of primordial black holes (PBHs), one of the primary candidates for dark matter. A new paper posted to the arXiv preprint server by researchers at Durham University and the University of New Mexico looks at the difficulties the LSST will have in finding those enigmatic objects, especially the statistical challenges, and how they might be overcome.

 

Japan on Sunday successfully launched a climate change monitoring satellite on its mainstay H-2A rocket, which made its final flight before it is replaced by a new flagship model designed to be more cost competitive in the global space market.

The H-2A rocket lifted off from the Tanegashima Space Center in southwestern Japan, carrying the GOSAT-GW satellite as part of Tokyo's effort to mitigate climate change. The satellite was safely separated from the rocket and released into a planned orbit about 16 minutes later.

Scientists and space officials at the control room exchanged hugs and handshakes to celebrate the successful launch, which was delayed by several days due to a malfunctioning of the rocket's electrical systems.

Keiji Suzuki, a Mitsubishi Heavy Industries official in charge of rocket launch operations, said he was more nervous than ever for the final mission of the rocket, which has been his career work. "I've spent my entire life at work not to drop H-2A rocket ... All I can say is I'm so relieved."

 

For years now, U.S. police departments have employed officers who are trained to be experts in detecting "drugged driving." The problem is, however, that the methods those officers use are not based on science, according to a new editorial in the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (JSAD).

With marijuana now legal in many U.S. states, the need for reliable tests for marijuana impairment is more pressing than ever. Police can evaluate alcohol-intoxicated drivers by using an objective measure of breath alcohol results. But there is no "breathalyzer" equivalent for marijuana. The drug is metabolized differently from alcohol, and a person's blood levels of THC (the main intoxicating chemical in marijuana) do not correlate with impairment.

So law enforcement relies on subjective tactics—roadside tests and additional evaluations by police officers specially trained to be so-called drug recognition experts (DREs). These officers follow a standardized protocol that is said to detect drug impairment and is said to even determine the specific drug type, including marijuana.

The process involves numerous steps, including tests of physical coordination; checking the driver's blood pressure and pulse; squeezing the driver's limbs to determine if the muscle tone is "normal" or not; and examining pupil size and eye movements.

But while the protocol has the trappings of a scientific approach, it is not actually based on evidence that it works, said perspective author William J. McNichol, J.D., an adjunct professor at Rutgers University Camden School of Law.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/46641802

 

Used a 12 inch bit. It's a great workout, but really sucked when we encountered tree roots with it. Tomorrow, I'm going to set some posts in concrete using the holes.

view more: next ›