BodilessGaze

joined 2 years ago
[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey, I grew up in a house with non-Euclidean geometry and I turned out fiPH'NGLUI MGLW'NAFH CTHULHU R'LYEH WGAH'NAGL FHTAGN

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Where do you get news from?

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

You just need more practice.

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What about the M-expression version (f[x])?

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Same reason Batman survives injuries that would be fatal to a normal person and why the thugs he beats up never die: the DC universe is just built different.

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Little tech? Like, a micro company that makes software? A "micro-soft", if you will.

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 77 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

I work in big tech and this is my life. I envy anyone who thinks you're exaggerating, because that means they haven't experienced the joy of spending weeks trying to track down the team responsible for a bug and then months hassling them to fix it.

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Me and my 9 disembodied heads judging people that don't learn an adhoc functional programming language solely so they can run Linux

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

~aaaaaaa~aaaaaa^AAAAAAAAAAAAAH^

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

But how would they rake in profits? These people are only paying $200/month at most, and OpenAI has already said they're losing money on Pro subscribers due to the cost of running those models. I don't see how OpenAI is going to become profitable off the consumer market alone, which means they have to focus on the business market. These AI addicts are a dangerous distraction to them, because not only are they losing money the more that susbscribe, but they're also getting bad publicity and attracting attention from regulators. That could scare off their actual cash cows (enterprise companies).

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

It changed my life. No words can possibly describe it.

 

Alt text: mod going MAD WITH POWER by inserting "rule" in the title of a post lacking it

(this is sarcasm, in case that wasn't abundantly clear)

 

From the conclusion:

NAT may be a good short term solution to the address depletion and scaling problems. This is because it requires very few changes and can be installed incrementally. NAT has several negative characteristics that make it inappropriate as a long term solution, and may make it inappropriate even as a short term solution. Only implementation and experimentation will determine its appropriateness.

 
view more: next ›